Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure Container Instances and SUSE Rancher

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances
Star Rating
(20)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (57.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Container Instances
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Star Rating
(118)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE Rancher
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Rancher excels in container orchestration with a strong focus on Kubernetes management, receiving a high score of 9.5 in containerization, while Azure Container Instances, although effective, does not offer the same level of orchestration capabilities, scoring lower in this area.
  • Reviewers mention that Rancher provides robust access control features, scoring 8.5, which allows for fine-grained permissions and security management, whereas Azure Container Instances has a slightly lower score in access controls, indicating less flexibility in managing user permissions.
  • G2 users highlight that Rancher’s edge analytics capabilities are impressive, scoring 9.2, which is beneficial for users needing real-time data processing at the edge, while Azure Container Instances does not emphasize edge analytics to the same extent, making it less suitable for edge computing scenarios.
  • Users on G2 report that Rancher’s quality of support is rated at 8.2, which some find lacking compared to Azure Container Instances, which has a higher support rating of 8.7, indicating a more responsive support system for users facing issues.
  • Reviewers say that Rancher shines in its performance and stability, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications, while Azure Container Instances, although stable, does not match Rancher’s performance metrics, making it less appealing for high-demand environments.
  • Users report that Rancher’s developer toolkit is rated lower at 7.8, which may hinder developers looking for extensive resources, while Azure Container Instances offers a more comprehensive toolkit, making it easier for developers to integrate and deploy applications.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Container Instances
No pricing available
SUSE Rancher
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Container Instances
No trial information available
SUSE Rancher
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
16
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.2
15
8.8
99
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.4
69
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.7
60
Quality of Support
8.2
15
8.2
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.6
54
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
17
9.6
89
Features by Category
Not enough data
9.1
16
Edge
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Operations
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Performance
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.4
80
Management
Not enough data
8.5
77
Not enough data
8.4
74
Not enough data
8.1
72
Organization
Not enough data
8.5
75
Not enough data
8.8
74
Not enough data
8.7
75
Development
Not enough data
7.8
72
Not enough data
8.5
74
Not enough data
8.2
72
Not enough data
8.7
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Azure Container Instances and SUSE Rancher are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances is categorized as Container Orchestration
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher is categorized as IoT Edge Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
57.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
26.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
15.8%
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
42.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances
Information Technology and Services
42.1%
Computer Software
15.8%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Retail
5.3%
Research
5.3%
Other
26.3%
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
9.7%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Financial Services
5.3%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.6%
Alternatives
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate
Add AWS Fargate
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Add DigitalOcean
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher Alternatives
Portainer
Portainer
Add Portainer
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Discussions
Azure Container Instances
Azure Container Instances Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Container Instances has no discussions with answers
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher Discussions
What are features of Rancher?
1 Comment
Edgars V.
EV
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
Edgars V.
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
How good is Rancher?
1 Comment
karen y.
KY
very good Read more