When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Google Cloud AutoML easier to use. However, Amazon SageMaker is easier to set up and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Amazon SageMaker overall.
Amazon SageMaker and Google Cloud AutoML both meet the requirements of our reviewers at a comparable rate.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Amazon SageMaker is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Amazon SageMaker over Google Cloud AutoML.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon SageMaker
No pricing available
Google Cloud AutoML
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon SageMaker
No trial information available
Google Cloud AutoML
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
38
8.6
14
Ease of Use
8.4
39
8.6
14
Ease of Setup
8.5
26
7.4
11
Ease of Admin
8.4
20
7.9
12
Quality of Support
8.6
34
7.5
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What is the best way to integrate Sagemaker models with Kubernetes?
1 Comment
VJ
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/machine-learning/introducing-amazon-sagemaker-operators-for-kubernetes/Read more
How do i make this platform reach to most of my developers?
1 Comment
VJ
you can manage the access via IAM users and roles and give them access as per their need, Sagemaker by default has all the basic AWS feature and you can...Read more
Amazon SageMaker has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.