Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and SUSE Rancher 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Star Rating
(276)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)SUSE Rancher
Star Rating
(118)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE RancherSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Rancher excels in local processing capabilities, scoring 8.8, which allows for efficient management of containerized applications on local infrastructure. In contrast, Amazon ECS does not have a specific local processing feature, which may limit flexibility for users needing on-premises solutions.
- Reviewers mention that Rancher offers superior edge analytics with a score of 9.2, enabling real-time data processing at the edge. Amazon ECS, while robust, does not emphasize edge analytics to the same extent, which could be a drawback for users focused on edge computing.
- G2 users highlight Rancher's strong performance in containerization, achieving a score of 9.5, which is crucial for users looking to optimize their container management. Amazon ECS also performs well but does not match this level of user satisfaction in this specific area.
- Users on G2 report that Rancher provides a more user-friendly experience with an ease of use score of 8.9, making it easier for teams to adopt and manage. In comparison, Amazon ECS has a lower ease of use score of 8.2, which may pose challenges for new users or smaller teams.
- Reviewers mention that Rancher’s access control features score 8.5, providing robust security measures for managing user permissions. Amazon ECS, with a score of 8.2, offers solid access control but may not be as comprehensive as Rancher’s offerings, which could be a concern for security-focused organizations.
- Users say that Rancher shines in orchestration with a score of 8.8, allowing for seamless management of containerized applications across multiple environments. Amazon ECS, while effective, scores slightly lower at 8.1, which may affect users looking for advanced orchestration capabilities.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No pricing availableSUSE Rancher
No pricing availableFree Trial
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No trial information availableSUSE Rancher
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
201
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.1
201
8.8
99
Ease of Setup
8.1
117
8.4
69
Ease of Admin
8.2
113
8.7
60
Quality of Support
8.3
186
8.2
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
111
8.6
54
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
180
9.6
89
Features by Category
Edge
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Operations
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Performance
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Management
8.2
106
8.5
77
8.1
103
8.4
74
Feature Not Available
8.1
72
Organization
8.1
97
8.5
75
8.0
99
8.8
74
8.2
101
8.7
75
Development
Feature Not Available
7.8
72
8.4
98
8.5
74
8.1
87
8.2
72
8.2
94
8.7
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and SUSE Rancher are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is categorized as Container Orchestration
SUSE Rancher is categorized as IoT Edge Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SUSE Rancher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
12.0%
Information Technology and Services
9.5%
Financial Services
7.9%
Marketing and Advertising
5.4%
Insurance
4.1%
Other
61.0%
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
9.7%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Financial Services
5.3%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Simpler
1 Comment
SP
ECS (containers) service page itself has main metrics link CPU utilization and memory utilization reports. If you need more stats you can go to cloudwatch...Read more
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) has no more discussions with answers
What are features of Rancher?
1 Comment
EV
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
