Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and IronWorker

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Star Rating
(276)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
IronWorker
IronWorker
Star Rating
(12)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IronWorker
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Amazon ECS excels in its integration with other AWS services, making it a preferred choice for enterprises already using the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, IronWorker is noted for its simplicity and ease of use, particularly for small businesses looking for a straightforward solution.
  • Reviewers mention that the quality of support for IronWorker is significantly higher, with a G2 rating of 9.3 compared to Amazon ECS's 8.4. Users appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of IronWorker's support team, which can be crucial for small businesses needing quick assistance.
  • G2 users highlight that Amazon ECS offers robust orchestration capabilities, rated at 8.1, which is essential for managing complex containerized applications. However, users on G2 note that IronWorker's orchestration features are simpler, making it easier for small teams to deploy and manage tasks without the overhead of complex configurations.
  • Reviewers say that Amazon ECS provides strong access control features, rated at 8.2, which is vital for enterprise-level security. In contrast, IronWorker's access control is less comprehensive, which may be a consideration for businesses with stringent security requirements.
  • Users report that the developer toolkit and architecture of Amazon ECS, rated at 8.4, are well-suited for developers looking for advanced features and flexibility. On the other hand, IronWorker is praised for its straightforward architecture, which allows developers to focus more on building applications rather than managing infrastructure.
  • Users on G2 mention that while Amazon ECS has a steeper learning curve, it ultimately offers more powerful features for large-scale applications. Conversely, IronWorker is favored for its user-friendly setup and administration, making it ideal for small businesses or teams with limited technical resources.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No pricing available
IronWorker
No pricing available
Free Trial
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
No trial information available
IronWorker
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
201
9.2
8
Ease of Use
8.1
201
8.1
8
Ease of Setup
8.1
117
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.2
113
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.3
186
9.3
7
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
111
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
180
6.1
9
Features by Category
8.2
123
Not enough data
Management
8.2
106
Not enough data
8.1
103
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Organization
8.1
97
Not enough data
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.2
101
Not enough data
Development
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.1
87
Not enough data
8.2
94
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
IronWorker
IronWorker
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) and IronWorker are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is categorized as Container Orchestration
IronWorker
IronWorker has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
17.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
46.9%
IronWorker
IronWorker
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
54.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
18.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.3%
Reviewers' Industry
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Computer Software
12.0%
Information Technology and Services
9.5%
Financial Services
7.9%
Marketing and Advertising
5.4%
Insurance
4.1%
Other
61.0%
IronWorker
IronWorker
Computer Software
36.4%
Marketing and Advertising
18.2%
Legal Services
18.2%
Motion Pictures and Film
9.1%
Investment Banking
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Add Kubernetes
IronWorker
IronWorker Alternatives
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Add DigitalOcean
Akamai Cloud Computing
Akamai Cloud Computing
Add Akamai Cloud Computing
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Add Red Hat OpenShift
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Discussions
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Discussions
Simpler
1 Comment
SP
ECS (containers) service page itself has main metrics link CPU utilization and memory utilization reports. If you need more stats you can go to cloudwatch...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) has no more discussions with answers
IronWorker
IronWorker Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
IronWorker has no discussions with answers