
I was very drawn to its very clean and open UI/UX design, which allowed me to see my most critical issues at the forefront all the time. I never lost view of things that needed my attention, which then allowed me to start drilling down from the top side and start prioritizing some of the changes I would have to make. Everything was done in very clear language, and the use of the color palette choices meant that critical issues really stood out. Anything less critical was still visible, but there was a prioritization, allowing me to focus on points that needed attention the most. It was also easy to navigate between different categories with the left nav view and tool tree on the left hand side, making it very easy to focus on a particular section. I appreciated its ease of use, clarity, and backing with framework references for security choices. The live data feedback in the risk centers was great for seeing dynamic changes or effects made by users, allowing me to act much quicker. The initial setup was also very simple, as it integrates seamlessly with my Google enviroments data Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
I wouldn't say that anything did not work for me. I took the trial, which ended up being an extended trial. It was probably at an earlier iteration of the actual application. I know that there have been improvements since that time. Because I took it up as a trial, there were some elements missing in the upgraded pro license for the seven days that I had it. I wasn't able to fully evaluate the risk centers, and I couldn't assess it against my own environment to understand the data a lot more cleanly. But I wouldn't say there was an issue with the product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

