Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Red Hat OpenShift and SUSE Rancher

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Star Rating
(303)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Red Hat OpenShift
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Star Rating
(118)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE Rancher
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Rancher excels in "Ease of Use" with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface, while Red Hat OpenShift, with a score of 8.4, is noted for its steeper learning curve, particularly for new users.
  • Reviewers mention that Rancher's "Application Deployment" feature scores an impressive 9.2, highlighting its streamlined process for deploying applications across multiple clusters, whereas OpenShift, while strong, scores slightly lower at 8.8, indicating it may require more configuration effort.
  • G2 users indicate that Rancher’s "Edge Application Management" feature, rated at 8.8, provides robust capabilities for managing applications at the edge, which is particularly beneficial for IoT deployments, while OpenShift's edge capabilities, though solid, do not match the same level of user satisfaction.
  • Users on G2 report that Rancher’s "Developer Toolkit" scores 7.8, which some find lacking in advanced features compared to OpenShift's 8.5, suggesting that OpenShift may offer a more comprehensive set of tools for developers looking for extensive support.
  • Reviewers say that Rancher’s "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.2, which some users find adequate, but they note that OpenShift's support, rated at 8.4, is often highlighted as more responsive and helpful, particularly for enterprise-level needs.
  • Users report that Rancher shines in "Containerization" with a perfect score of 9.5, emphasizing its efficiency in managing containerized applications, while OpenShift, with a score of 9.0, is still highly regarded but may not offer the same level of performance in this specific area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing available
SUSE Rancher
No pricing available
Free Trial
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information available
SUSE Rancher
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
83
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.2
226
8.8
99
Ease of Setup
7.8
193
8.4
69
Ease of Admin
8.6
57
8.7
60
Quality of Support
8.4
73
8.2
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
53
8.6
54
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
80
9.6
89
Features by Category
Not enough data
9.0
16
Edge
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Operations
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Performance
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.8
6
Not enough data
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Monitoring
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
Analysis
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Issue Resolution
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
8.8
27
Not enough data
Development
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.5
17
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
Database
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
22
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Infrastructure
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.7
39
8.4
80
Management
8.5
32
8.5
77
8.4
31
8.4
74
8.2
30
8.1
72
Organization
8.5
32
8.5
75
8.9
33
8.8
74
9.1
31
8.7
75
Development
8.5
27
7.8
72
8.8
30
8.5
74
8.6
25
8.2
72
9.2
26
8.7
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Red Hat OpenShift and SUSE Rancher are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher is categorized as IoT Edge Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
23.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
27.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
49.1%
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
26.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.0%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
42.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Information Technology and Services
15.5%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
9.2%
Computer Software
8.5%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Other
45.9%
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
9.7%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Financial Services
5.3%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.6%
Alternatives
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift Alternatives
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Add VMware vSphere
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher Alternatives
Portainer
Portainer
Add Portainer
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Mirantis
Add Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Add Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS)
Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Kubernetes Engine
Add Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE)
Discussions
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift Discussions
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
Narayanaswamy G.
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
SUSE Rancher
SUSE Rancher Discussions
What are features of Rancher?
1 Comment
Edgars V.
EV
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
Edgars V.
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
How good is Rancher?
1 Comment
karen y.
KY
very good Read more