Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Pricing Overview

Free Trial

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

6 months

Return on Investment

21 months

Average Discount

21%

Perceived Cost

$$$$$

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Pricing Reviews

(2)
Verified User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
AT
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Easily the best integration platform for the last 20 years and still retains the crown today"
What do you like best about IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration?

We have been using webMethods Integration Server for almost 20 years, and it has been enormously successful in our organization.

We've applied it in many varied application to application and business to business integration scenarios. We've used it to standardize how we integrate disparate technologies in our environment. We have always found it to be relatively cheap in terms of the hours of effort it takes a good webMethods developer to build a robust solution.

Developing in the webMethods Flow language is incredibly easy and intuitive, and the graphical presentation in the tooling of data structures and the logic to map or translate between them, the bread and butter of this kind of software, is second to none.

It has excellent performance characteristics given that it runs on the Java Virtual Machine, and the ability to drop from webMethods flow down to pure Java code is an extra escape hatch when you need the very best performance possible.

However, the thing I like the best about webMethods Integration Server is how extensible it is, which means we have used it to solve problems way beyond its usual remit.

IBM webMethods continues to be the best choice for an integration platform, with the latest 11.1 release being a solid, stable, and reliable workhorse in the safe hands of IBM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration?

What I dislike most about webMethods Integration Server is the lack of name recognition and attendant reputation in the general tech community. Software AG and webMethods are not well known outside of the technology integration niche, and that means that some other big guys that are better known because they don't just play in the integration space are looked on by laypeople such as executive level managers as a better safer choice.

However, webMethods is the market leading technology in the integration space, and in my opinion has been the leader for 20 years. It's a shame it is still in the shadow of some other bigger names that have lesser competing products in the same space.

With IBM's acquisition of the webMethods suite of integration products hopefully we will see a surge in name recognition and webMethods will rightly become more revered and famous for its excellence even with executives and management and other laypeople. Also hopefully IBM will price webMethods aggressively to expand its market and compete against the mid-level players that currently undercut webMethods in price but are far outclassed in quality when compared with webMethods. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reshma R.
RR
Digital Specialist Engineer
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Great Integration and Security, But Pricey and Complex"
What do you like best about IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration?

Powerful Integration

Seamless Connectivity

Good for Hybrid Environment

Security & Monitoring

Scalability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration?

High Cost

Poor Documentation

Complex Usability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration Comparisons
Product Avatar Image
Apache Camel
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
Boomi
Compare Now
Product Avatar Image
Product Avatar Image