
The most immediate improvement I noticed after migrating my heavier workloads to this VPS infrastructure was the raw I/O performance provided by the NVMe SSD storage. In my previous setups with standard SATA SSDs, I would frequently hit I/O bottlenecks during complex MySQL JOIN operations or when running automated backups during peak hours. With these NVMe drives, the disk latency is virtually non-existent for my use cases. I can run concurrent read and write operations, such as importing large CSV datasets into a database while simultaneously serving dynamic content, without seeing the wait time spike in my server monitoring. It genuinely feels like the storage layer is no longer the weak link in my stack, which is a significant relief for data-intensive applications.
I also appreciate the genuine KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) virtualization they utilize. Unlike OpenVZ environments I have used in the past, where you are effectively sharing a kernel and hitting beancounter limits that are opaque and frustrating, this KVM setup gives me true isolation. I can load my own kernel modules, tweak sysctl.conf parameters for high-concurrency networking, like increasing net.core.somaxconn , and even run Docker containers without worrying about permissions issues or conflicts with the host node. The ability to have full root access via SSH immediately upon provisioning means I can bypass the control panel entirely and manage the server using Ansible playbooks, which fits perfectly into my existing DevOps workflow.
Another strong point is the global data center availability. Being able to provision a server specifically in the EMEA region for my European clients or the US West Coast for domestic traffic has measurably reduced Time to First Byte (TTFB) for my end users. The network throughput has been surprisingly consistent. Running iperf tests between my nodes usually shows stable bandwidth availability, and I have not experienced the noisy neighbor network congestion that often plagues budget VPS providers. This network stability, combined with the dedicated IP address included in the plan, has made it a reliable endpoint for hosting my own mail server, as the IP reputation seems to be better managed than on their shared hosting ranges.
Finally, the automated snapshot backup system is a lifesaver for rapid development cycles. Before I attempt a risky upgrade, such as moving from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04 or updating a critical PHP version, I can manually trigger a snapshot from the dashboard. If the upgrade breaks my configuration files or dependencies, restoring the entire machine state takes just a few clicks and a few minutes, rather than hours of manual rebuilding. This safety net encourages me to keep my software stack more up to date than I otherwise would if I had to rely solely on my own off-site backup scripts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
The renewal pricing model is, frankly, the most frustrating aspect of maintaining this service long term. While the introductory rate was very attractive and competitive with other unmanaged VPS providers, the jump in cost upon renewal is jarring. It often increases by nearly 100% or more. It forces me to constantly evaluate whether the hassle of migrating to a new provider is worth the savings, which creates an unnecessary mental overhead. I dislike the feeling that loyalty is penalized rather than rewarded. I would much prefer a flat, transparent monthly rate that does not require me to commit to a 3-year term just to get a reasonable price.
I also find the scalability to be incredibly rigid compared to modern cloud standards. If I need more RAM because my Redis cache is growing, I cannot simply scale up the memory independently. I am forced to upgrade to the next tier which might double my CPU cores and storage space, and subsequently the bill, even if I do not need those extra resources. In 2026, the inability to custom configure resource blocks like CPU, RAM, and Storage independently feels archaic. I often end up over-provisioning and paying for CPU cycles I will never use, simply because my application is memory hungry.
Furthermore, the user interface and support structure for the self-managed plans are heavily tilted towards upselling rather than solving technical problems. When I log into the dashboard to check my server status, I am bombarded with prompts to buy Website Security, Email Protection, or Fully Managed Services. It feels like I am fighting through a sales brochure to get to my server console. Additionally, when I have encountered network level issues that were clearly on their end, like a routing drop, the tier 1 support script is almost always to blame my configuration first. Getting escalated to a technician who actually understands Linux routing tables usually takes far too long and requires navigating a maze of unhelpful chatbots and knowledge base articles that are irrelevant to a VPS environment.
Lastly, the lack of granular firewall controls outside of the server itself is a missed opportunity. While I can configure ufw or iptables inside the OS, I would prefer a cloud level firewall or security group in the dashboard to block traffic before it even hits my network interface. Relying solely on the OS firewall means my server still has to process the packets to drop them, which consumes CPU during a DDoS attack. Other providers offer this upstream filtering as a standard feature, and its absence here makes me feel slightly more vulnerable to volumetric attacks despite their claims of DDoS protection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Our network of Icons are G2 members who are recognized for their outstanding contributions and commitment to helping others through their expertise.
Validated through LinkedIn
Invitation from G2. This reviewer was not provided any incentive by G2 for completing this review.


