Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Kudu and Hbase 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Kudu
Star Rating
(13)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KuduHbase
Star Rating
(114)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HbaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hbase excels in its auto sharding capabilities, with a score of 8.6, making it a preferred choice for those needing efficient data distribution. In contrast, Apache Kudu's auto sharding scored only 4.7, indicating a significant area for improvement.
- Reviewers mention that Hbase offers a robust data model with a score of 8.1, which supports a variety of data types effectively. However, users on G2 note that Apache Kudu, while scoring slightly higher at 8.7, struggles with certain data types, scoring only 6.3 in that area.
- G2 users highlight that Hbase has a solid performance in data replication, scoring 7.2, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity. Conversely, Apache Kudu received a higher score of 7.7, indicating better performance in this aspect, as users appreciate its reliability in data recovery.
- Users say that Hbase's ease of setup is rated at 7.3, which some find challenging compared to Apache Kudu's impressive score of 8.7. Reviewers mention that Kudu's setup process is more straightforward, making it more accessible for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Hbase's role-based authorization feature scores 7.7, providing a good level of security for users. In contrast, Apache Kudu's security features, particularly in this area, scored lower at 6.3, leading users to express concerns about its security robustness.
- Users report that Hbase shines in its overall product direction with a positive score of 8.2, indicating a strong commitment to future development. In comparison, Apache Kudu's product direction score of 6.1 suggests that users are less confident in its future enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kudu
No pricing availableHbase
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Kudu
No trial information availableHbase
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.1
9
8.2
90
Ease of Use
7.8
9
7.6
90
Ease of Setup
8.7
5
7.3
40
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.0
40
Quality of Support
7.5
10
7.6
82
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
5
8.0
34
Product Direction (% positive)
6.1
9
8.2
85
Features by Category
Storage
8.7
5
8.1
6
6.3
5
7.2
6
Availability
4.7
5
8.6
6
6.3
5
6.1
6
7.7
5
7.2
6
Performance
7.3
5
7.0
5
Security
6.3
5
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kudu
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Telecommunications
16.7%
Logistics and Supply Chain
16.7%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Information Technology and Services
8.3%
Hospital & Health Care
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Computer Software
22.3%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Financial Services
4.9%
Other
32.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Kudu has no discussions with answers
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
Hbase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
