Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Star Rating
(202)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Progress Kemp LoadMasterRadware Alteon Application Delivery and Security
Star Rating
(20)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Radware Alteon Application Delivery and SecuritySummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Progress Kemp LoadMaster excels in user experience, with a clean and easy-to-use web interface that simplifies setup. Users appreciate the availability of templates for most applications, making the initial configuration much smoother compared to Radware Alteon, which, while straightforward, does not offer the same level of intuitive guidance.
- Users say that Progress Kemp LoadMaster provides robust performance and reliability, with features like SSL/TLS offloading and content switching. This strong feature set is highlighted by reviewers who mention its flexibility in deployment options, including hardware, virtual, and cloud environments, which gives it an edge over Radware Alteon in terms of adaptability.
- According to verified reviews, Radware Alteon is praised for its high-availability mode, which enhances service resilience and minimizes downtime. Users find its interface easy to navigate, particularly for managing SSL certificates, but it lacks the extensive feature set and deployment flexibility that Kemp offers.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Kemp LoadMaster has a slight advantage in support quality, with users noting responsive assistance when needed. In contrast, while Radware Alteon also receives positive feedback for its support, it does not match the consistently high ratings that Kemp has garnered in this area.
- Users highlight that Progress Kemp LoadMaster's ease of setup is a significant benefit, with many finding the upgrade process seamless, even in high availability configurations. Radware Alteon, while manageable, does not provide the same level of user-friendly setup experience, which can be a drawback for teams looking for quick deployment.
- G2 reviewers indicate that both products meet user requirements effectively, but Progress Kemp LoadMaster edges out with a slightly higher satisfaction rating. Users appreciate the comprehensive reporting and performance metrics available in Kemp, which enhances day-to-day usability compared to Radware Alteon's more basic reporting features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
No pricing availableRadware Alteon Application Delivery and Security
No pricing availableFree Trial
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial is available
Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
144
9.3
5
Ease of Use
9.1
144
7.7
5
Ease of Setup
8.9
136
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.2
128
8.3
5
Quality of Support
9.2
136
9.0
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
139
8.5
14
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
137
7.7
5
Features by Category
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Controls
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
7.8
38
Not enough data
7.2
38
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Not enough data
8.3
36
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
8.9
38
Not enough data
7.7
37
Not enough data
7.9
36
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
7.9
37
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster and Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no unique categories
Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security is categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
7.4%
Hospital & Health Care
6.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Government Administration
4.2%
Other
64.7%
Banking
22.2%
Telecommunications
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Financial Services
11.1%
Computer & Network Security
11.1%
Other
22.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?
2 Comments
NS
Hi John,
The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands. From...Read more
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no more discussions with answers
Radware Alteon Application Delivery and Security has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
