Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Zephyr Enterprise 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringZephyr Enterprise
Star Rating
(80)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (41.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Zephyr EnterpriseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in Test Variety with a score of 9.3, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, while Zephyr Enterprise, although strong, scores lower in this area, indicating less flexibility in test types.
- Reviewers mention that the Ease of Setup is a significant advantage for Zephyr Enterprise, which scored 8.3 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly.
- G2 users highlight the superior Reporting capabilities of OpenText LoadRunner Professional, scoring 9.0, which provides detailed insights into test results, whereas Zephyr Enterprise, while competent, scores slightly lower at 9.2, indicating a less comprehensive reporting feature.
- Users on G2 emphasize the importance of Quality of Support, where Zephyr Enterprise shines with a score of 8.3, suggesting that users feel more supported, while LoadRunner's score of 7.6 indicates room for improvement in customer service.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText LoadRunner Professional's Test Repository feature, scoring 8.8, is highly regarded for its organization and accessibility, which is crucial for teams managing multiple test cases, while Zephyr's repository features are noted as less robust.
- Users say that the Functionality of OpenText LoadRunner Professional, particularly in Stress Testing with a score of 8.3, is a key differentiator, as it allows for more rigorous performance evaluations compared to Zephyr Enterprise, which does not focus as heavily on this aspect.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableZephyr Enterprise
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableZephyr Enterprise
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.3
69
Ease of Use
8.3
24
7.8
71
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
8.4
39
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
8.6
38
Quality of Support
7.6
24
8.2
55
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
8.3
33
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
7.1
69
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.5
12
Management
Not enough data
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
7.6
9
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Zephyr Enterprise are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Zephyr Enterprise is categorized as Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zephyr Enterprise
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Computer Software
22.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.5%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Marketing and Advertising
3.9%
Internet
3.9%
Other
44.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Zephyr Enterprise has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
