When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found them equally easy to use. However, k6 is easier to set up and administer. While OpenText Core Performance Engineering is easier to do business with overall.
Reviewers felt that OpenText Core Performance Engineering meets the needs of their business better than k6.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that k6 is the preferred option.
When assessing product direction, OpenText Core Performance Engineering and k6 received similar ratings from our reviewers.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No pricing available
k6
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText Core Performance Engineering
No trial information available
k6
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.5
11
9.3
14
Ease of Use
9.2
11
9.2
15
Ease of Setup
9.2
8
9.6
9
Ease of Admin
9.0
8
9.4
9
Quality of Support
8.8
10
9.3
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Hi guys, please teach me how to write the response body o whatever data, in a txt file, csv o .dat file as a dataset for subsequent requests. ?
1 Comment
PC
Hi Cesar,
we could assist you better if you post your question to the k6 OSS community forum:
https://community.k6.io/c/k6-support/
It would be...Read more
What is k6 performance tool?
1 Comment
MB
Basically, it's a powerful, modern framework for performance testing.Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.