Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mend.io and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Mend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, highlighting its ability to provide thorough insights into code quality. In contrast, Mend.io received a lower score of 8.2, indicating that while it offers solid analysis, it may not be as comprehensive as SonarQube.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube's Code Analysis feature is highly rated at 9.1, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for detailed code metrics. Mend.io, however, scored only 7.5 in this area, suggesting it may lack some depth in code evaluation.
- G2 users highlight that Mend.io shines in Compliance Testing, scoring 7.8, which is notably higher than SonarQube's score of 7.1. This indicates that Mend.io may be better suited for organizations with stringent compliance requirements.
- Users on G2 report that SonarQube's Ease of Setup is rated at 7.8, while Mend.io slightly outperforms it with a score of 8.1, suggesting that Mend.io may offer a more user-friendly initial setup experience.
- Reviewers mention that Mend.io has a strong focus on False Positives, scoring 5.0, which is significantly better than SonarQube's score of 6.6. This indicates that Mend.io may provide more accurate results, reducing the noise in vulnerability reports.
- Users say that SonarQube's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, while Mend.io received a higher score of 8.7, suggesting that users may find Mend.io's customer support more responsive and helpful when issues arise.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mend.io
No pricing availableSonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
81
8.8
108
Ease of Use
8.3
82
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
8.1
50
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
8.2
50
8.5
63
Quality of Support
8.7
67
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
46
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
75
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
7.6
7
7.8
19
7.7
8
6.0
20
Analysis
7.3
11
7.4
21
7.6
11
8.0
20
8.2
11
8.9
22
7.6
11
9.0
22
Testing
7.2
10
6.6
18
Feature Not Available
5.9
19
7.2
9
6.0
21
7.7
10
6.9
18
Feature Not Available
6.8
17
7.4
9
8.2
21
5.0
9
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.2
45
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.7
35
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.9
33
Not enough data
7.0
32
Not enough data
7.9
33
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mend.io and SonarQube are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Unique Categories
Mend.io is categorized as Container Security
SonarQube is categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Code Analysis, Bug Tracking, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
