Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mend.io and SonarQube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Mend.io
Star Rating
(112)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Mend.ioSonarQube
Star Rating
(128)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that SonarQube excels in overall user satisfaction, reflected in its higher G2 Score and a significant number of recent reviews. Users appreciate its simple deployment process, especially when using Kubernetes, and the seamless integration with GitHub actions, which allows developers to conduct scans efficiently.
- Users say that Mend.io offers a user-friendly experience, particularly highlighting its ease of integration into source code repositories. This feature enables teams to scan multiple repositories without extensive configuration, making onboarding straightforward and efficient.
- Reviewers mention that SonarQube provides valuable code suggestions that enhance code quality and help identify potential errors. This focus on static code analysis is a standout feature, with users noting its effectiveness in improving code security and maintainability.
- According to verified reviews, Mend.io shines in its customer support, with users describing it as responsive and helpful. This level of support can be crucial for teams needing quick assistance during implementation or troubleshooting.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while SonarQube has a strong presence in enterprise environments, it may not cater as effectively to smaller businesses compared to Mend.io, which has a significant user base in that segment. This could influence the choice for teams based on their organizational size and needs.
- Users report that both products have similar scores for ease of setup, but SonarQube's higher ratings in areas like static code analysis and issue tracking suggest it may provide a more robust solution for teams focused on code quality and security.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mend.io
No pricing availableSonarQube
Cloud - based: Free
Free
For developers wanting to try SonarQube.
- Scan of private projects limited to 50k lines of code
- Users limited to max. 5
- Architecture management
Free Trial
Mend.io
Free Trial is available
SonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
81
8.8
110
Ease of Use
8.3
82
8.5
113
Ease of Setup
8.1
50
8.1
72
Ease of Admin
8.2
50
8.6
64
Quality of Support
8.7
67
8.2
92
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
46
8.4
58
Product Direction (% positive)
8.6
75
8.6
107
Features by Category
Administration
7.6
7
7.8
19
7.7
8
6.0
20
Analysis
7.3
11
7.4
21
7.6
11
8.0
20
8.2
11
9.0
23
7.6
11
9.1
23
Testing
7.2
10
6.6
18
Feature Not Available
5.9
19
7.2
9
6.0
21
7.7
10
6.9
18
Feature Not Available
6.8
17
7.4
9
8.2
21
5.0
9
6.8
22
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.1
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
7.9
8
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Network
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Application
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.5
45
Not enough data
8.5
47
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.2
45
Not enough data
8.8
44
Not enough data
8.6
45
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
7.8
36
Not enough data
7.6
35
Not enough data
8.2
36
Security
Not enough data
6.8
34
Not enough data
7.1
33
Not enough data
7.9
33
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Model Protection - AI Security Solutions
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Runtime Monitoring - AI Security Solutions
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Policy Enforcement and Compliance - AI Security Solutions
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mend.io and SonarQube are categorized as Software Composition Analysis, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), and Static Code Analysis
Unique Categories
Mend.io is categorized as Container Security, AI Security Solutions, Vulnerability Scanner, and Software Supply Chain Security Tools
SonarQube is categorized as Secure Code Review, Software Development Analytics Tools, Bug Tracking, AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mend.io
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Financial Services
6.7%
Telecommunications
4.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.8%
Other
36.2%
Information Technology and Services
27.0%
Computer Software
21.4%
Financial Services
7.1%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is a contributing developer?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
“Contributing Developer” means any employee or contractor who at any point (1) accesses or uses the WhiteSource product; (2) develops the code to be scanned...Read more
Do you offer an on-premise option?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource is a cloud-based service, but we also offer an on-premise option, if necessary. It’s important to emphasize that we do not scan your code. We...Read more
Why are you pricing per contributing developers?
1 Comment
Official Response from Mend.io
WhiteSource automates and manages open source components throughout the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC). Therefore, pricing based on the number of...Read more
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
