Klocwork vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText Static Application Security Testing easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with OpenText Static Application Security Testing overall.
Reviewers felt that Klocwork meets the needs of their business better than OpenText Static Application Security Testing.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that OpenText Static Application Security Testing is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of OpenText Static Application Security Testing over Klocwork.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Klocwork
No pricing available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing available
Free Trial
Klocwork
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
19
8.3
15
Ease of Use
7.9
19
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
7.5
8
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
7.3
8
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.5
19
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Hi Vikash,
Typically, Klocwork scans* these days are automated through CI/CD pipelines and as part of the overall DevOps infrastructure. This all started...Read more
How do I integrate it in a linux make file
1 Comment
SH
Hi Chris. There should be no need to 'integrate' with the makefile itself, the Klocwork kwinject tool will simply capture the build process by wrapping the...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.