Link copied to clipboard # Git vs Plastic SCM Comparison - What are their main differences? Share [ Export ](/compare/git/plastic-scm/export.csv) GitPlastic SCM[+ Add Product](#) Reviews **Git** [ 4.7/5(539) ](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews#reviews) **Plastic SCM** [ 4.2/5(36) ](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews#reviews) Pricing **Git** No pricing available **Plastic SCM** Free Trial **$9.95** user/month ยท Team **Pricing Insights** from reviews Time to Implement **Git** 1 monthFaster Based on 23 responses **Plastic SCM** 2 months Based on 7 responses Return on Investment **Git** 6 months Based on 19 responses **Plastic SCM** Not enough reviews yet Perceived Cost **Git** $$$$$ **Plastic SCM** $$$$$ Average Discount **Git** 19% **Plastic SCM** Not enough reviews yet Pros & Cons **Git** Not enough data **Plastic SCM** Not enough data Integrations **Git** [ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_92678e42a1cad1b80e7d257e3636e25e/android-studio.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Android Studio ](https://www.g2.com/products/android-studio/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2ac0e7b10e1efb64107026cb2b241d53/azure-pipelines.jpg "Product Avatar Image") Azure Pipelines ](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-pipelines/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_2ea5f7178028686921161d65d4be481a/bitbucket.png "Product Avatar Image") Bitbucket ](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews)[ ![Product Avatar Image](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/large_detail/large_detail_41f2b5eb5eb8a0a5ee3906c191ea8433/cursor.png "Product Avatar Image") Cursor ](https://www.g2.com/products/cursor/reviews)[ View all ](https://www.g2.com/products/git/integrations) **Plastic SCM** Not enough data Screenshots **Git** ![Git screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/31763/Git_screenshot1.png) **Plastic SCM** ![Plastic SCM screenshot](https://images.g2crowd.com/cdn-cgi/image/width=600,height=600,fit=scale-down,format=auto,onerror=redirect,/https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/attachment/file/33784/PlasticSCM_screenshot2.png) Ratings Meets Requirements **Git** 9.4 9.4465 **Plastic SCM** 7.6 7.626 Ease of Use **Git** 8.2 8.2469 **Plastic SCM** 7.9 7.926 Ease of Setup **Git** 9.0 9.0136 **Plastic SCM** 8.0 8.016 Ease of Admin **Git** 8.2 8.273 **Plastic SCM** 7.7 7.716 Quality of Support **Git** 8.7 8.7379 **Plastic SCM** 8.5 8.523 Has the product been a good partner in doing business? **Git** 8.7 8.758 **Plastic SCM** 8.5 8.516 Product Direction (% positive) **Git** 9.1 9.1453 **Plastic SCM** 8.1 8.125 Features Show 1 feature category with incomplete data Version Control Software[Hide 44 FeaturesShow 44 Features](javascript:void(0);) Not enough data Not enough data Activity Tracking Activity Tracking Not enough data Not enough data API API Not enough data Not enough data AI Copilot AI Copilot Not enough data Not enough data Third-Party Integrations Third-Party Integrations Not enough data Not enough data Workflow Management Workflow Management Not enough data Not enough data Alerts/Notifications Alerts/Notifications Not enough data Not enough data Mobile Access Mobile Access Not enough data Not enough data Generative AI Generative AI Not enough data Not enough data Change Management Change Management Not enough data Not enough data Reporting/Analytics Reporting/Analytics Not enough data Not enough data Access Controls/Permissions Access Controls/Permissions Not enough data Not enough data Issue Management Issue Management Not enough data Not enough data Version Control Version Control Not enough data Not enough data Audit Trail Audit Trail Not enough data Not enough data Authentication Authentication Not enough data Not enough data Search/Filter Search/Filter Not enough data Not enough data Project Management Project Management Not enough data Not enough data Workflow Automation Workflow Automation Not enough data Not enough data Content Library Content Library Not enough data Not enough data Task Progress Tracking Task Progress Tracking Not enough data Not enough data Custom Development Custom Development Not enough data Not enough data Two-Factor Authentication Two-Factor Authentication Not enough data Not enough data Issue Tracking Issue Tracking Not enough data Not enough data Visual Analytics Visual Analytics Not enough data Not enough data Assignment Management Assignment Management Not enough data Not enough data Continuous Integration Continuous Integration Not enough data Not enough data Rules-Based Workflow Rules-Based Workflow Not enough data Not enough data Repository Management Repository Management Not enough data Not enough data Performance Monitoring Performance Monitoring Not enough data Not enough data Backup and Recovery Backup and Recovery Not enough data Not enough data Application Management Application Management Not enough data Not enough data Bug Tracking Bug Tracking Not enough data Not enough data Testing/QA Management Testing/QA Management Not enough data Not enough data Encryption Encryption Not enough data Not enough data Wiki Wiki Not enough data Not enough data Bug/Issue Capture Bug/Issue Capture Not enough data Not enough data Vulnerability Scanning Vulnerability Scanning Not enough data Not enough data Static Analysis Static Analysis Not enough data Not enough data Security Testing Security Testing Not enough data Not enough data Configuration Automation Configuration Automation Not enough data Not enough data Code Repository Integration Code Repository Integration Not enough data Not enough data Collaborative Development Collaborative Development Not enough data Not enough data Multiple Programming Languages Supported Multiple Programming Languages Supported Not enough data Not enough data Code Review Code Review Not enough data Not enough data User Insights Reviewers' Company Size [![Git](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e4ae003c4d9b2b7615189af32032183d/git.png "Git")](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) Git Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 35.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 29.2% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 35.1% [![Plastic SCM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1537960625/plastic-scm.svg "Plastic SCM")](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) Plastic SCM Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.) 64.7% Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.) 14.7% Enterprise(\> 1000 emp.) 20.6% Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.) 35.7% 64.7% Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.) 29.2% 14.7% Enterprise (\> 1000 emp.) 35.1% 20.6% Reviewers' Industry [![Git](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_e4ae003c4d9b2b7615189af32032183d/git.png "Git")](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) Git Computer Software 33.0% Information Technology and Services 21.0% Internet 8.6% Marketing and Advertising 4.0% Computer & Network Security 2.9% Other 30.5% [![Plastic SCM](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1537960625/plastic-scm.svg "Plastic SCM")](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) Plastic SCM Computer Games 20.6% Information Technology and Services 11.8% Automotive 8.8% Computer Software 8.8% Animation 5.9% Other 44.1% FAQs ## Git vs Plastic SCM FAQs Generated using AI Last updated: August 14, 2026 ### What is the difference between Git vs Plastic SCM? Git stands out for its higher reviewer satisfaction, broader adoption, and stronger setup and support scores compared to Plastic SCM. | [Git](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) | [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) | | --- | --- | | 4.7/5 (538 reviews) | 4.2/5 (36 reviews) | | Small-Business | Small-Business | | 9.0 | 8.0 | | 8.7 | 8.5 | | Reliable version control, strong collaboration, and extensive integrations | Handles large binary files well, user-friendly GUI, strong for game development | ### How do the pricing models of Git and Plastic SCM compare? Git is rated higher for value, with reviewers expressing greater satisfaction with its cost compared to Plastic SCM. - **Git:** Reviewers consistently highlight Git's open-source, free-to-use model as a major advantage, making it highly accessible for individuals and teams. - **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers note that cost is a concern, with several mentioning that Plastic SCM is not free and that Git is preferred for its zero-cost entry. - **Switching reasons:** In recent reviews, cost and open-source accessibility are cited as key reasons for choosing Git over Plastic SCM. ### What are the best alternatives to Git and Plastic SCM? The top 3 alternatives to Git and Plastic SCM are P4, Azure DevOps Server, and GitHub. | Product | G2 Rating (reviews) | Largest Segment | Pricing Insight | Top Reviewer-Cited Strength | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | [Git](https://www.g2.com/products/git/reviews) | 4.7/5 (538 reviews) | Small-Business | Free and open-source | Reliable version control, strong collaboration, and extensive integrations | | [Plastic SCM](https://www.g2.com/products/plastic-scm/reviews) | 4.2/5 (36 reviews) | Small-Business | Commercial, cost noted as a concern | Handles large binary files well, user-friendly GUI, strong for game development | | [P4](https://www.g2.com/products/p4/reviews) | 4.2/5 (95 reviews) | Mid-Market | โ€” | Strong for enterprise-scale version control and binary asset management | | [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) | 4.2/5 (200 reviews) | Mid-Market | โ€” | Integrated CI/CD and project management capabilities | | [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews) | 4.7/5 (2399 reviews) | Small-Business | โ€” | Industry-standard code hosting, collaboration, and automation | ### Which Version Control Software features should I prioritize when comparing Git and Plastic SCM? Buyers comparing Git and Plastic SCM should prioritize version control capabilities, ease of setup, support for large binary files, integrations, and user interface. - **Version control capabilities:** Git scores 9.4 for Meets Requirements, while Plastic SCM scores 7.6. - **Ease of setup:** Git scores 9.0, Plastic SCM 8.0. - **Support for large binary files:** Plastic SCM is frequently cited for handling large binaries and game development assets, while Git reviewers note challenges with large files. - **Integrations:** Git is mentioned in 88 reviews for GitHub, 24 for Bitbucket, and 23 for GitLab; Plastic SCM is cited for cloud and CI/CD integrations in recent reviews. - **User interface:** Plastic SCM is praised for its GUI and visual branch management, while Git is noted for its command-line interface and broad IDE support. ### What are the pros and cons of Git vs Plastic SCM? Git's headline strength is its robust, distributed version control and collaboration, while Plastic SCM excels at handling large binary files and providing a user-friendly GUI for game development. - **Git strengths:** Reliable version control, strong collaboration features, extensive integrations, open-source and free, high performance, and detailed history tracking. - **Git trade-offs:** Steep learning curve, unintuitive command-line interface for beginners, challenging merge conflict resolution, and less efficient handling of large binary files. - **Plastic SCM strengths:** Handles large binary files efficiently, user-friendly GUI, strong for game development and Unity/Unreal Engine projects, file locking, and visual branch management. - **Plastic SCM trade-offs:** Commercial cost, less frequent branching and merging flexibility compared to Git, UI and documentation can be confusing for new users, and some reviewers cite slower performance with certain plugins (e.g., Unreal Engine). ### Is Git or Plastic SCM better for small businesses? Git is the better fit for small businesses, with a larger small-business segment and stronger reviewer sentiment on accessibility and value. - **Git:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers consistently highlight its accessibility, free cost, and ease of adoption for small teams. - **Plastic SCM:** Largest segment is Small-Business; reviewers note its GUI and binary file handling, but cost and complexity are cited as concerns for smaller teams. ### Which Version Control Software platform has better integrations? Git is favored for integrations, with reviewers citing a broader range of supported tools and higher mention counts. - **Git:** GitHub (88 all-time mentions), Bitbucket (24), GitLab (23); reviewers highlight strong integration with major code hosting and CI/CD platforms. - **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers mention integrations with public cloud and CI/CD tools in recent reviews, but no all-time mention counts are available. ### How do Git and Plastic SCM compare on customer support? Git and Plastic SCM are rated in near-parity on Quality of Support, with scores of 8.7 and 8.5 respectively, indicating similar reviewer satisfaction. - **Git:** Reviewers describe support as reliable and accessible, with extensive documentation and community resources. - **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers note responsive support and helpful documentation, though some mention a need for improved onboarding materials. ### Which is easier to implement, Git or Plastic SCM? Git is rated higher for Ease of Setup, with a 9.0 score compared to Plastic SCM's 8.0, indicating a smoother implementation experience for most reviewers. - **Git:** Reviewers frequently cite straightforward setup, quick onboarding, and broad documentation support. - **Plastic SCM:** Reviewers mention a generally positive setup experience, especially for teams handling large files, but note that initial configuration and learning the interface can be more complex. Alternatives **Git Alternatives** ![Azure DevOps Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/611e56424aac6932c16d11e70b4b24a4/azure-devops-server.svg "Azure DevOps Server") [ Azure DevOps Server ](/products/azure-devops-server/reviews) ![P4](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/35a0df1d713ddcc19e24e463ef622fa5/p4.svg "P4") [ P4 ](/products/p4/reviews) ![AWS CodeCommit](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/1528476487/aws-codecommit.svg "AWS CodeCommit") [ AWS CodeCommit ](/products/aws-codecommit/reviews) ![Subversion](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_9d00048205a466c174da3c77093a1336/subversion.png "Subversion") [ Subversion ](/products/subversion/reviews) **Plastic SCM Alternatives** ![P4](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/35a0df1d713ddcc19e24e463ef622fa5/p4.svg "P4") [ P4 ](/products/p4/reviews) ![GitHub](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/image/thumb_square/thumb_square_8ec3c17e3fb1df25b6a8bd7cc69cf2d1/github.png "GitHub") [ GitHub ](/products/github/reviews) ![GitLab](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/2397ccd7309ef2bca71e3a275d59a5a3/gitlab.svg "GitLab") [ GitLab ](/products/gitlab/reviews) ![Azure DevOps Server](https://images.g2crowd.com/uploads/product/hd_favicon/611e56424aac6932c16d11e70b4b24a4/azure-devops-server.svg "Azure DevOps Server") [ Azure DevOps Server ](/products/azure-devops-server/reviews)