Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ENOVIA and Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent RedEye
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Meridian
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Azumuta
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (70.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ENOVIA
Star Rating
(75)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ENOVIAOracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Star Rating
(94)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (70.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle PLM excels in Product Approval with a score of 9.0, indicating a streamlined process that many find efficient, while ENOVIA's score of 8.6 suggests it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that ENOVIA shines in BOM Types management, achieving a high score of 9.4, which users appreciate for its flexibility and variety, compared to Oracle PLM's score of 8.2.
- G2 users highlight that Oracle PLM offers superior Ease of Setup with a score of 7.8, making it more user-friendly for new implementations, whereas ENOVIA's lower score of 6.0 indicates potential challenges during initial setup.
- Users on G2 note that ENOVIA provides better CAD Options with a score of 8.7, which reviewers say enhances their design capabilities, while Oracle PLM's score of 7.1 suggests it may have fewer options available.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform similarly in Data Quality, with Oracle PLM scoring 8.5 and ENOVIA matching that score, indicating that users can expect reliable data management from either solution.
- Users say that ENOVIA's Quality Planning capabilities are particularly strong, scoring 9.0, which reviewers appreciate for its thoroughness, while Oracle PLM's score of 8.3 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ENOVIA
No pricing availableOracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
No pricing availableFree Trial
ENOVIA
No trial information availableOracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
50
8.2
60
Ease of Use
7.1
50
7.7
62
Ease of Setup
6.0
24
7.8
23
Ease of Admin
6.5
24
8.1
24
Quality of Support
7.5
48
7.9
57
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
6.9
25
7.8
25
Product Direction (% positive)
7.0
50
6.1
60
Features by Category
New Product Introduction
8.2
14
7.9
17
|
Verified
8.0
14
|
Verified
8.3
15
|
Verified
8.6
12
|
Verified
8.1
14
|
Verified
8.6
14
|
Verified
9.0
18
|
Verified
CAD
8.9
15
|
Verified
7.7
13
|
Verified
8.7
15
|
Verified
7.1
11
|
Verified
8.3
15
|
Verified
7.9
12
|
Verified
Collaboration
8.1
15
|
Verified
8.0
16
|
Verified
8.2
14
|
Verified
8.4
17
|
Verified
8.2
14
|
Verified
8.2
19
|
Verified
8.6
12
|
Verified
8.4
19
|
Verified
Product Data Management
8.8
12
|
Verified
8.4
17
|
Verified
8.5
14
|
Verified
8.5
17
|
Verified
8.8
14
|
Verified
8.2
19
|
Verified
Bill of Materials
8.4
15
|
Verified
8.7
21
|
Verified
8.6
14
|
Verified
8.8
20
|
Verified
9.4
13
|
Verified
8.2
19
|
Verified
9.2
13
7.8
19
Engineering Change Management
8.8
14
|
Verified
8.4
19
|
Verified
8.9
14
|
Verified
8.5
20
|
Verified
9.0
13
|
Verified
8.6
20
|
Verified
Simulation
8.3
13
8.5
9
8.5
12
|
Verified
7.7
10
|
Verified
8.6
11
8.5
9
|
Verified
Analytics
8.5
14
|
Verified
7.8
17
|
Verified
8.1
12
|
Verified
7.2
13
|
Verified
8.6
12
|
Verified
7.9
13
|
Verified
Quality management
9.0
12
|
Verified
8.3
16
|
Verified
9.0
12
|
Verified
8.2
17
|
Verified
9.4
13
|
Verified
7.8
17
|
Verified
Integration
8.7
13
8.2
18
|
Verified
8.5
12
7.9
11
8.3
11
|
Verified
8.3
16
|
Verified
9.4
11
|
Verified
8.2
13
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ENOVIA and Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) are categorized as Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Unique Categories
ENOVIA has no unique categories
Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ENOVIA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.9%
Airlines/Aviation
14.9%
Aviation & Aerospace
13.4%
Oil & Energy
10.4%
Automotive
10.4%
Other
35.8%
Medical Devices
15.4%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
11.5%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Semiconductors
5.1%
Information Technology and Services
5.1%
Other
55.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
ENOVIA has no discussions with answers
Does Oracle own agile?
1 Comment
PG
Yes they bought Agile PLM around 2010-2011Read more
Oracle Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
