Users report that GNU Make has a steeper learning curve compared to CMake, with many reviewers mentioning that the syntax can be less intuitive for beginners, making it harder to set up complex build processes.
Reviewers mention that CMake excels in cross-platform support, with users on G2 highlighting its ability to generate native build files for various platforms, which simplifies the process of building applications across different environments.
G2 users indicate that GNU Make is highly efficient for smaller projects, with reviewers saying that its simplicity and speed make it a preferred choice for straightforward build tasks, while CMake is better suited for larger, more complex projects.
Users say that CMake's integration with modern IDEs is a significant advantage, as many reviewers report that it provides a smoother development experience with tools like Visual Studio and CLion, enhancing productivity.
Reviewers mention that GNU Make has a strong community and extensive documentation, which users appreciate for troubleshooting and finding examples, while CMake's documentation is also praised but noted to be less comprehensive in certain areas.
Users report that both tools have their strengths in terms of support, but GNU Make tends to have a slight edge in quality of support, with reviewers saying that the community is very responsive to queries and issues.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CMake
No pricing available
GNU Make
No pricing available
Free Trial
CMake
No trial information available
GNU Make
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
9.4
16
Ease of Use
6.6
16
6.9
16
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
6.9
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
7
Quality of Support
7.2
10
7.5
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.