When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Cassandra easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Hbase overall.
Reviewers felt that Cassandra meets the needs of their business better than Hbase.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Hbase is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Hbase over Cassandra.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cassandra
No pricing available
Hbase
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cassandra
No trial information available
Hbase
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
29
8.2
90
Ease of Use
7.8
29
7.6
90
Ease of Setup
8.2
18
7.3
40
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
7.0
40
Quality of Support
7.5
24
7.6
82
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.