Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cassandra and Hbase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cassandra
Star Rating
(35)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CassandraHbase
Star Rating
(114)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HbaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hbase excels in its auto sharding capabilities, with a score of 8.6, making it easier to manage large datasets across distributed systems. In contrast, Cassandra's auto sharding feature, while effective, does not receive the same level of praise, indicating room for improvement.
- Reviewers mention that Hbase's data replication feature scores 7.2, which is adequate but not exceptional. Cassandra, however, shines in this area with a higher score of 8.9, suggesting that users find it more reliable for maintaining data consistency across nodes.
- G2 users highlight Hbase's ease of setup, scoring 7.3, which some find challenging compared to Cassandra's higher score of 8.2. This indicates that users may find Cassandra more user-friendly when it comes to initial deployment.
- Users on G2 report that Hbase's security features, particularly role-based authorization, score 7.7, which is seen as a strong point. In contrast, Cassandra's security features, including encryption, receive a lower score of 6.7, suggesting that users may have concerns about its security robustness.
- Reviewers say that Hbase's overall stability is rated at 7.9, which is commendable, but Cassandra edges ahead with a score of 8.0, indicating that users may experience fewer disruptions and better performance consistency with Cassandra.
- Users report that Hbase's data manipulation capabilities score 7.1, which some find limiting compared to Cassandra's lower score of 6.4. This suggests that users may find Hbase more effective for their data manipulation needs, despite its other limitations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cassandra
No pricing availableHbase
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cassandra
No trial information availableHbase
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
29
8.2
90
Ease of Use
7.8
29
7.6
90
Ease of Setup
8.2
18
7.3
40
Ease of Admin
7.9
16
7.0
40
Quality of Support
7.5
24
7.6
82
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
13
8.0
34
Product Direction (% positive)
6.9
26
8.2
85
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Availability
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
6.1
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Performance
Not enough data
7.0
5
Security
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
6.7
5
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scalability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Wide Column Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cassandra and Hbase are categorized as Wide Column Database
Unique Categories
Cassandra is categorized as Key Value Databases
Hbase is categorized as Columnar Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cassandra
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hbase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.3%
Internet
18.2%
Computer Software
12.1%
Retail
9.1%
Computer & Network Security
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Information Technology and Services
25.2%
Computer Software
22.3%
Banking
8.7%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Financial Services
4.9%
Other
32.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cassandra has no discussions with answers
In HBase, we cannot implement any cross data operations and joining operations, of course, we can implement the joining operations using MapReduce, which would take a lot of time to designing and development. How we can improve this??
1 Comment
GE
Check out Apache Phoenix - https://phoenix.apache.org/
Read more
Hbase has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
