Users report that Database as a Service (DBaaS) excels in "Application Performance" with a score of 9.2, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL trails behind at 8.5, indicating that DBaaS may provide a more responsive experience for applications.
Reviewers mention that "Database Monitoring" is a strong point for DBaaS, scoring 9.1 compared to Azure's 8.5, suggesting that users may find it easier to track performance and issues with DBaaS.
G2 users highlight the superior "Provisioning" capabilities of Database as a Service (DBaaS) with a score of 9.3, while Azure Database for PostgreSQL only scores 7.6, indicating a more streamlined setup process with DBaaS.
Users on G2 report that "Data Masking" is a standout feature for Database as a Service (DBaaS) with a score of 9.4, which may appeal to organizations with strict data privacy requirements, whereas Azure's capabilities in this area are less robust.
Reviewers say that "Scalability" is a strong suit for both products, with Database as a Service (DBaaS) scoring 9.4 and Azure Database for PostgreSQL at 9.3, indicating that both options can handle growth effectively, but DBaaS has a slight edge.
Users report that "Backup" features are particularly strong in Azure Database for PostgreSQL, scoring 9.6 compared to DBaaS's 9.1, suggesting that Azure may offer more reliable backup solutions for critical data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
No pricing available
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Database for PostgreSQL
No trial information available
Database as a Service (DBaaS)
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
13
9.0
42
Ease of Use
8.5
12
8.8
42
Ease of Setup
7.2
6
9.0
21
Ease of Admin
8.1
6
8.5
17
Quality of Support
7.7
13
8.7
41
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.