Full Cycle Development Software

Some things I dislike about Polarion are its slow performance at times, especially when handling large projects 📂. The interface also feels a bit outdated and not very intuitive to navigate 🧭. If the setup process were simpler and the customization options more flexible, the overall user experience would improve a lot ⚙️. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Polarion helps me manage requirements, track changes, and organize all project work in one centralized space 📌. It improves traceability, keeps everyone aligned, and makes collaboration much smoother 🤝. By reducing confusion and keeping real-time updates connected, it saves a lot of time and helps the team stay more productive and organized 🚀📊. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At first, I found it quite difficult to use, but after going through a few tutorials, I became more comfortable with it. The software is definitely very complex. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Having a centralized location to store all our data and resources for product testing has been invaluable. We are currently testing an AI app designed to scan for eye diseases, which involves managing a significant amount of data, conducting various tests, and ensuring privacy functions are in place. It can be challenging to find a single platform that covers all these needs in detail, but SpiraPlan do just that. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike that Codebeamer’s interface can feel a bit complex for new users, making the learning curve steeper than expected. Some advanced configurations also require extra time and technical know-how to set up efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Codebeamer is solving the challenge of managing complex product development lifecycles by integrating requirements, risk, and test management in one platform. It ensures full traceability across teams and compliance with industry standards. This has streamlined collaboration, reduced manual tracking, and significantly improved project visibility and delivery accuracy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ergonomics of the tool could be improved. The UI is good but the UX lacks fluidity. Every new user must be guided to understand how to grasp the tool, where to find information, and the little tips and tricks to know in order not to get stuck on actions that are often simple. The Docker images of Tuleap are not tagged, so reverting to a given version of the product is difficult (we end up tagging the images ourselves with the version numbers). Finally, when an action in Tuleap does not work correctly, the logs are not very informative, even for an administrator profile. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Tuleap allows us to facilitate exchanges between the different stakeholder teams of the projects. Even the teams that are put off by agility understand the benefits of Tuleap. Nevertheless, this requires strong support from the internal administrator. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

According to me Spiratest is a good tool, and I don't have anying that I disliked about SpiraTest. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Using spira has enabled us to work as a team seamlessly, it helps us distribute work effectively and stay organized when it comes to understanding requirements and meeting

expectations. Manageing and getting back followups from the team regularly has become so much more simpler, this helps us dedicate our

time and energy entirely towards productivity eliminating any levay in manageing and asking for followups. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are not many issues with SpiraTeam.Some user feel the interface could be more intuitive, but overall, it works well without major complaints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SpiraTeam helps teams stay on the same page by putting all project information in one place. This makes it easier to fix problems quickly and keeps work moving smoothly, as everyone is using the same system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In the version I use, I can't resize the windows at the time of creation, and this makes things difficult sometimes when the window resolution is very large. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ease of creating professional UX-focused graphical interfaces. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helix ALM is a premium tool, and licensing costs can add up, especially for larger teams.

It may not be the best option for companies looking for budget-friendly solutions.While the tool is highly customizable, setting it up for a specific workflow can take considerable time and effort, which may be challenging for teams with limited technical resources.Although it integrates well with other tools, Helix ALM doesn't natively offer the same level of real-time collaboration features (e.g., chat or collaboration spaces) that some other project management tools do. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Provides excellent traceability throughout the entire development lifecycle. You can trace from requirements to test cases, test results, and issues, ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Allows for impact analysis to see how changes to requirements affect other areas. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integration with third party tool can sometimes be challenging Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helps in tracing the requirements to the test cases thereby improving the test coverage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI feels outdated compared to modern Agile tools like Jira. Performance can lag when handling large repositories, especially on web clients. Setup and onboarding require expertise, and there's a steep learning curve for teams not familiar with Jazz architecture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We're using EWM to manage development across multiple teams in a highly regulated industry. It helps ensure compliance through enforced workflows, audit trails, and tight integration with requirements and test management tools. This has significantly improved traceability and reduced audit risk. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The inability to create views with multi level tracing. Being forced to go to the RS to create these views is cumbersome. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is giving us strong tracability and document publishing capability Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.