Watermark Planning & Self-Study Pricing Overview

Aligns goals, tracks outcomes, supports accreditation, enables collaboration, and drives continuous improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Less useful functions include overly rigid templates that can limit flexibility in representing unique program structures or nuanced narratives. The interface, while functional, may feel unintuitive or outdated, leading to a learning curve for new users. Customizing reports and dashboards often requires technical support or advanced training, reducing accessibility for average users. Integration with non-Watermark systems can be limited or cumbersome, especially for institutions with diverse data ecosystems. Automated notifications and workflow tracking, while helpful, can generate excessive emails or lack nuance in complex review cycles. Additionally, the platform's emphasis on compliance and documentation may encourage a box-checking mentality, potentially detracting from genuine reflection and innovation. While these limitations do not negate the system’s value, they can hinder user engagement and reduce the efficiency of institutional processes if not carefully managed. Institutions must invest in training and thoughtful implementation to mitigate these challenges. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is not much that I like about this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's not user friendly; anytime i have questions, i cannot talk to a person, i only get sent emails with links to read information. i've asked for additional training and was told that for a fee we could have some training. the initial training was not all inclusive, it went too fast and was not enough. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.