We are a systems integrator (SI) / IT services provider and implemented SecuPi for a large FSI customer. It effectively addressed the data security requirements, especially the data deidentification or anonymization of PII that is almost a "set once, use always" type of system. The anonymization approach eliminates the need for costly and inefficient application code changes while preserving data governance and visibility to what is happening with the data. It is relatively easy to implement given the straightforward architecture. We received support from a highly technical and capable team from SecuPi during the implementation, allowing for quick resolution of the few issues we had. After the initial training, the end users were able to take over the setup and administration of data security policies in the SecuPi Management Server (SMS) dashboard. We were able to successfully integrate with the source systems (databases and files), the target data platform (Cloudera) up to the consumption layer (Tableau / DBeaver). In addition, I believe SecuPi can play a big role in providing the guardrails to secure PII in this time of AI. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think better marketing materials would help spread the word about the availability of a "code-less" solution to anonymizing / securing PII Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The SecuPi Platform is praised for its efficiency and reliability, allowing organizations to protect sensitive data without requiring code changes. Users appreciate its real-time monitoring capabilities, which help detect unauthorized access and ensure compliance with regulations like GDPR. Additionally, the platform's dynamic data masking feature is highlighted for its effectiveness in maintaining data privacy. However, some users have noted that it may require more user-friendly features and automation in data classification processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Here are some dislikes about the SecuPi Platform:

Integration Issues: Users have reported that integrating SecuPi with other systems can be cumbersome and time-consuming.

Complexity: The platform is considered complex to understand, requiring significant training for users to switch to it.

Manual Data Classification: There is a need for automation in the data classification process, as it is currently done manually.

Support Limitations: The support provided by SecuPi is noted to be not very fast, which can be a drawback for users.

Dynamic Data Masking: Some users feel that the dynamic data masking feature needs improvement for better usability.

These points highlight some of the challenges users may face with the SecuPi Platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like how SecuPi Platform lets us protect sensitive data without having to change any application code. It's great that we can apply data masking and monitoring centrally while allowing users to work with production data, making it practical for real enterprise environments, especially when dealing with legacy systems and compliance requirements. SecuPi's ability to integrate into our existing data access architecture as a security layer without requiring changes to tools like Oracle, SQL Server, BI, and reporting applications is something I appreciate. The initial setup was quite straightforward for those who are familiar with database and security architectures, and overall, the process was manageable without impacting existing applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some areas that could be improved are performance and troubleshooting visibility in complex or high-volume reporting scenarios. When large reports run through SecuPi, it can be harder to quickly identify bottlenecks or understand where delays occur. Additionally, clearer diagnostics and more detailed logging during network interruptions or agent disconnections would help speed up issue analysis and reduce operational effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SecuPi safeguards data not only where it is stored, but also during access. There is no need to modify applications or rewrite SQL, and performance remains unaffected. Policies are applied in real time, ensuring strict access control and comprehensive auditability of every action. In summary, SecuPi protects data precisely when it is most critical. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Setting up takes a considerable amount of time, and the policies require careful tuning to prevent excessive blocking. It can also be challenging to quickly determine the reason why a particular query was masked or blocked. Additionally, there is a steeper learning curve, especially for teams that do not specialize in security. In summary, while the tool is powerful, it is not a plug-and-play solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the centralized data security platform and how it offers faster deployment for secure data access by reducing the need for complex custom security implementations. It really speeds up the process of securing data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The SecuPi Platform is quite complex, which often requires more training and support. The policy debugging aspect also needs improvement. Setup and configuration efforts are significant, taking quite some time. Additionally, support responsiveness could be better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From my point of view I believe SecuPi is an excellent tool for performing data masking. I am using it for a custom scenario where the customer requires data masking. It is highly valued because it helps the customer do this optimally and also integrate it with other third-party tools. Moreover SecuPi can be configured in many different ways. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my experience, the DAM functionality could be improved compared to the data masking feature, particularly in terms of flexibility when searching for specific traffic. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like using the SecuPi Platform because defining and enforcing policies is made easy, which allows for centralized governance to be enforced effectively. Additionally, the UI works well and contributes positively to my experience with the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Integrating it with Azure policies was a challenge because we had many Azure policies that couldn't be directly governed through SecuPi. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This product addresses a longstanding challenge by providing unified data protection across various data sources and platforms. Additionally, its support for both cloud and on-premises environments means that larger organizations can implement a single enterprise solution, rather than relying on separate tools for cloud and on-premises needs. The support teams are very knowledgable and hooked into the product which helps problem resolution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Certain tasks involve multiple steps, which can make the process rather complicated and challenging to navigate. Additionally, setting up the integrations can be difficult and may require extra effort to implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sensitive data protection.

Ease of use and deploy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Services mechanisms could be improved asap. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Intelligent, technical support for data security and data privacy protection. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Support is limited, and deployment is only possible with certain technology. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.