SecuPi Platform Reviews & Product Details

I really like how SecuPi Platform lets us protect sensitive data without having to change any application code. It's great that we can apply data masking and monitoring centrally while allowing users to work with production data, making it practical for real enterprise environments, especially when dealing with legacy systems and compliance requirements. SecuPi's ability to integrate into our existing data access architecture as a security layer without requiring changes to tools like Oracle, SQL Server, BI, and reporting applications is something I appreciate. The initial setup was quite straightforward for those who are familiar with database and security architectures, and overall, the process was manageable without impacting existing applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some areas that could be improved are performance and troubleshooting visibility in complex or high-volume reporting scenarios. When large reports run through SecuPi, it can be harder to quickly identify bottlenecks or understand where delays occur. Additionally, clearer diagnostics and more detailed logging during network interruptions or agent disconnections would help speed up issue analysis and reduce operational effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The SecuPi Platform is praised for its efficiency and reliability, allowing organizations to protect sensitive data without requiring code changes. Users appreciate its real-time monitoring capabilities, which help detect unauthorized access and ensure compliance with regulations like GDPR. Additionally, the platform's dynamic data masking feature is highlighted for its effectiveness in maintaining data privacy. However, some users have noted that it may require more user-friendly features and automation in data classification processes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Here are some dislikes about the SecuPi Platform:

Integration Issues: Users have reported that integrating SecuPi with other systems can be cumbersome and time-consuming.

2

Complexity: The platform is considered complex to understand, requiring significant training for users to switch to it.

2

Manual Data Classification: There is a need for automation in the data classification process, as it is currently done manually.

1

Support Limitations: The support provided by SecuPi is noted to be not very fast, which can be a drawback for users.

2

Dynamic Data Masking: Some users feel that the dynamic data masking feature needs improvement for better usability.

1

These points highlight some of the challenges users may face with the SecuPi Platform Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This product addresses a longstanding challenge by providing unified data protection across various data sources and platforms. Additionally, its support for both cloud and on-premises environments means that larger organizations can implement a single enterprise solution, rather than relying on separate tools for cloud and on-premises needs. The support teams are very knowledgable and hooked into the product which helps problem resolution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Certain tasks involve multiple steps, which can make the process rather complicated and challenging to navigate. Additionally, setting up the integrations can be difficult and may require extra effort to implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SecurePi platform is fast and reliable with less effort and the most cost-effective implementation. It protects the data both in use and at rest. Deploy it across all applications in just a few days. Also, the most important thing I like the most about this platform is that data remains accurate and unmanipulated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It needs more improvement in dynamic data masking, what I feel. It needs to be more user-friendly, and automation is required in the tool because data classification is done manually. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.