Crash Reporting and User Tracking have changed how we prioritize incidents because we can see how many users are actually affected, rather than sorting everything purely by exception count. That kind of context matters more to me than a noisy error inbox. Raygun keeps occurrences grouped and ties them back to individual users, which makes it much easier to separate a rare edge case from something that’s quietly impacting an important customer segment. Our .NET integration via Raygun4Net.AspNetCore has been straightforward. Unhandled exceptions are captured automatically, and we manually send handled exceptions when they still warrant investigation. We also use the ILogger provider and the Serilog sink so certain events land in the same diagnostic context. Deployment Tracking is another feature I wouldn’t want to give up at this point. Each release is connected to new errors, regressions, and unresolved issues, so when something starts failing a few minutes after production we can jump straight to the release that introduced it, instead of opening an incident and starting with the usual first question: what changed? APM and Real User Monitoring complete the picture from both sides. APM highlights slow requests and backend operations, while RUM shows what the browser experience actually looks like. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Pricing needs a little more planning because Crash Reporting, RUM, and APM are sold around separate products and usage levels rather than one simple flat license. That flexibility is useful if a team only needs part of the stack, but higher-traffic applications need a realistic usage estimate before adopting all three. I would prefer a clearer combined cost model for teams that already know they want crash reporting, performance monitoring, and real-user visibility together. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
