Honestly, Miro's become part of my daily toolkit as a cloud architect — I'm in it constantly mapping out system architecture and specs that end up shared across half the company.

The canvas itself is great — going from a messy whiteboard sketch to something presentable is easy, and frames keep big diagrams from turning into spaghetti. Where it struggles is really large diagrams (100+ nodes, lots of icons) — panning gets a bit sluggish and real-time collab with a few people editing at once can lag.

Integrations are honestly a highlight — Jira, Slack, etc sets mean I rarely have to leave the board to keep things connected to actual tickets and docs.

It's genuinely your source of truth for architecture, it pays for itself by replacing three or four other tools and killing the "which version is current" problem.

Onboarding is basically nonexistent because the UI is intuitive enough that people I share boards with just figure it out. Support has been fine, nothing amazing.

AI features are a nice bonus but not core to my workflow yet — good for a rough first draft, not precise enough for real architecture work. Would love to see it get smarter about generating diagrams straight from infra-as-code.

Overall: great daily driver Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Biggest gripe is diagram density — once a board gets busy (which happens fast with real architecture work), connectors start crossing and overlapping and there's no smart auto-routing to clean it up. I end up manually untangling lines just to keep things readable, which is time I shouldn't have to spend.

Performance is the weak spot for exactly the boards where it matters most — big, icon-heavy architecture diagrams get sluggish to pan and zoom, especially with a few people editing at once. Some kind of simplified rendering when zoomed out would help a lot.

A lot of stuff that should be table stakes (better permissions, deeper integrations, admin controls) is locked behind a pretty steep jump to Business/Enterprise. Rough sell when the tier with what I need is priced like it's for a 500-person org.

Onboarding for basic stuff is easy since the UI is intuitive, but there's not much real guidance for advanced use — like how to structure boards for a big team or keep things maintainable long-term. Ends up being trial and error or digging through community forums. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Miro is how it helps me organize ideas and collaborate with my team. I use it a lot during product discovery, especially after user interviews. The AI features are one of my favorite parts because they can analyze hundreds of sticky notes, group similar insights, and create clear summaries. This saves me a lot of time and reduces the manual work of organizing research. Since the summaries are usually very accurate, I can focus more on understanding user needs and making better product decisions instead of spending hours sorting information. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I don’t like about Miro is the language consistency in the AI features. Most of my boards and notes are in Portuguese, so I write my AI prompts in Portuguese as well. However, the AI often generates the final document or summary in English. This creates extra work because I have to ask the AI to translate everything back into Portuguese before I can share it with my team. I would like the AI to automatically keep the same language as the prompt or the board content. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Things I like about MIRO, when the work is messy, highly collaborative, and hard to capture in a slide deck or a Word document - example, multiple people can work together on an ideation (e.g., a system workflow) on a meeting together with no need to track changes. It’s helpful when you need to get people aligned around a process, risk, decision — when different people interpret the same topic in different ways, can't imagine holding a workshop without using Miro.

For me, the real benefit is being able to move from rough thinking to a more structured output in the same space — use of various tools in one space instead of opening multiple files, like sticky notes, process diagrams, voting, comments, tables, screenshots, etc. can all live together on one board. It does not require a lot of training to use, it is easy to get started and intuitive, regardless of the seniority of the employee.

It has got innovative real time integrations with slack, tables, JIRA, etc. that make the information relevant on the page. The whiteboard includes tremendous amount of information and the performance is not clunky or doesn't lag even on slower internet connections. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really. I believe there is a dependency on internet to be able to work, which means I can't use in on an airplane or train if the connection isn't good. Additionally, it is not designed to version control - i.e., the information is typically overwritten without the audit trail, our work around to manage that is we create duplicate Miro boards as a make shift solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Miro is its ability to bring everyone into a single collaborative workspace, regardless of whether they are internal team members, consultants, owners, or other stakeholders. It allows us to review designs, brainstorm ideas, perform QA/QC, track action items, and maintain live project schedules in real time. The visual and interactive format makes it easy for everyone to contribute, react to changes, and make decisions together, which improves coordination and keeps projects moving forward efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Large boards can become difficult to navigate without strong organization, and managing access for external stakeholders can sometimes be cumbersome. However, these are relatively minor issues compared to the value Miro provides for collaboration and project coordination. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Miro is amazing for collaboration, great with workshops, and the syncing tool is also great. The templates are really helpful, the way that you can host meetings and update work together as well as running tasks and challenged it's great. Great for doing UX flows to understand user journeys and visualise user behaviours and mindsets. I think the support is great, and the updates via email are helpful. I have used the AI tool quite a few times to collate and summarise data and that has saved me time for sure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think in the past tables have been changed by other people because they're synced - can we have a more obvious warning when things are being edited? Maybe edit history would be good too. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Miro to organize Product management workshops and solve remote collaboration problems, which is super useful. It also allows for managing complex documentation and synchronizing all project stakeholders around the same document. I find Miro very adaptable to different formats like brainstorming, backlog design, and daily cards. You can do a lot with this tool, and the fact that it is vector-based is a real joy. The collaborative aspect is absolutely wonderful, promoting a freedom and creativity that is completely unleashed, which is really appreciable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Managing structures at Miro is a real challenge. I have encountered real constraints regarding the creation and sharing of boards, especially depending on the size of the structures that use it. Navigating through the structures, among the different teams and departments, is very complicated. Honestly, I sometimes have to ask for help to create and share boards with certain entities in my organization. It really happens at the interface level and in the management of photos, and in that area, there is real room for improvement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Miro for capturing problems across different product surfaces, and it really shines during brainstorms, retros, and planning sessions when trying to build coherent views across teams. I love the ease of pasting images, creating shapes, and editing them to denote various relationships and information. It’s also relatively easy to share with others. The platform feels 'unlimited' in how much I can create and expand the view, and the UI is friendly and easy to manipulate. Additionally, the connection with Jira, especially the two data binding, works well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish it was a bit clearer or easier to view when certain objects had been grouped together. You kind of need to click and play around to figure out that some items are grouped. I wish there was a way where I could press a button and view the linked object so I could figure out if I needed to break some things apart. I also wish there were nicer templates and icons. Right now to me the templates are a little bit ugly, and I tend to use the same few simple shapes and icons for my tasks. I'd also love to have better theming of objects. I sometimes want to use our company's brand colors but that doesn't seem to be solved as a problem. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The infinite collaborative canvas is by far my favourite feature, because it really helps my team come together and brainstorm using sticky notes.

Additionally, now that they’ve introduced AI features like the User Persona Generator and user feedback-to-insights, it’s been really helpful for our product design team to generate quick insights.

Recently, they also introduced the sidekicks, which we’re using to summarize the board and keep it organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t think there’s anything our team doesn’t like, since we’ve been using Miro for years. That said, with the new AI features coming in, we do need to spend some time understanding how to leverage them so they actually make our workflow more effective.

Sometimes I also feel the zoom in/out is a bit too fast for me, but I’m getting used to it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best part is the possibility to share the board and other person can edit, paste sticky notes, change and review. This feature is very usefull to remote teams.

Another part that is very good is the integrations. In the printscreen I shared users can see Miro interacting with Jira and to me is very helpful.

I also asked to Miro AI to organize the tickets for me, and this board was created in less than 1 minute, increasing my performance a lot! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only part that’s a bit confusing is when colleagues try to access my board for the first time: they sometimes have trouble finding it, even when using the link provided. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's really handy having a collaborative space that is easily accessed from anywhere. We use it as a reference guide that anyone can update. Also as a way to create and share storyboards for passing work between teams. Even as a place to create fun onboarding spaces. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes intricate diagrams get a bit finnicky, but it's mostly when pushing it to its limits. The mouse wheel changing between zooming and scrolling can be a bit annoying too. A large board can take anywhere from 1-3GB of RAM, so you might need a decent machine for complex boards. Haven't really used the AI in it to its full potential. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.