# Top 10 CODA Footprint Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.9/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 11 Explore the best alternatives to CODA Footprint for users who need new software features or want to try different solutions. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to CODA Footprint include reliability and ease of use. The best overall CODA Footprint alternative is Wiz. Other similar apps like CODA Footprint are Scrut Automation, CloudBees, Tenable Nessus, and Arctic Wolf. CODA Footprint alternatives can be found in [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) but may also be in [Threat Intelligence Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/threat-intelligence) or [Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-security-posture-management-cspm). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to CODA Footprint - [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) - [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) - [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) - [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) - [Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/arctic-wolf/reviews) - [Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/products/recorded-future/reviews) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) - [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) - [Pentera](https://www.g2.com/products/pentera/reviews) - [Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/products/check-point-exposure-management/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to CODA Footprint Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how CODA Footprint stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer & Network Security, Information Technology and Services, and Banking, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) By Wiz **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 826 Wiz is a CNAPP that consolidates CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, vulnerability management, IaC scanning, CIEM, DSPM, and container and Kubernetes security into a single platform. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Wiz is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-wiz-wiz) **Compare Wiz with other alternatives:** - [Wiz vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Wiz vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-wiz-wiz) ### 2. [Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/products/scrut-automation/reviews) By Scrut Automation **Average Rating:** 4.9/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,313 Automatically test your cloud configurations against 150+ CIS benchmarks across multiple cloud accounts on AWS, Azure, GCP and more, to maintain a strong infosec posture. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Scrut Automation is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-scrut-automation) **Compare Scrut Automation with other alternatives:** - [Scrut Automation vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Scrut Automation vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Scrut Automation vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-scrut-automation) - [Scrut Automation vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-scrut-automation) ### 3. [CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/products/cloudbees/reviews) By CloudBees **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 621 Enabling the world’s biggest and brightest companies to transition from incoherent, disconnected DevOps to self-service, fast, secure workflows connecting software delivery to business outcomes. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, CloudBees is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-cloudbees) **Compare CloudBees with other alternatives:** - [CloudBees vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-wiz-wiz) - [CloudBees vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-scrut-automation) - [CloudBees vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-tenable-nessus) - [CloudBees vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cloudbees) - [CloudBees vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-recorded-future) - [CloudBees vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-cloudbees) - [CloudBees vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-intruder) - [CloudBees vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-pentera) - [CloudBees vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cloudbees) ### 4. [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) By Tenable **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 303 From the beginning, we've worked hand-in-hand with the security community. We continuously optimize Nessus based on community feedback to make it the most accurate and comprehensive vulnerability assessment solution in the market. 20 years later and we're still laser focused on community collaboration and product innovation to provide the most accurate and complete vulnerability data - so you don't miss critical issues which could put your organization at risk. Tenable is a 2021 Gartner Representative Vendor in Vulnerability Assessment. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Tenable Nessus is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-tenable-nessus) **Compare Tenable Nessus with other alternatives:** - [Tenable Nessus vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Tenable Nessus vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/scrut-automation-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Tenable Nessus vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-tenable-nessus) ### 5. [Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/products/arctic-wolf/reviews) By Arctic Wolf Networks **Average Rating:** 4.7/5 **Total Reviews:** 280 Arctic Wolf provides Cyber-SOC as a service, designed to make every link in the security chain stronger. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Arctic Wolf is: - More expensive - Better at meeting requirements - Easier to admin Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-coda-footprint) **Compare Arctic Wolf with other alternatives:** - [Arctic Wolf vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Arctic Wolf vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-scrut-automation) - [Arctic Wolf vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cloudbees) - [Arctic Wolf vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Arctic Wolf vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-recorded-future) - [Arctic Wolf vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm) - [Arctic Wolf vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-intruder) - [Arctic Wolf vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-pentera) - [Arctic Wolf vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-check-point-exposure-management) ### 6. [Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/products/recorded-future/reviews) By Recorded Future **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 230 Recorded Future Intelligence Cloud elevates your existing security defenses by enhancing the depth and breadth of protection by giving you insights into threats and attacks before they impact, so you can stay ahead of attackers, at the speed and scale of today’s threat environment. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Recorded Future is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management), [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-recorded-future) **Compare Recorded Future with other alternatives:** - [Recorded Future vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Recorded Future vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-scrut-automation) - [Recorded Future vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-recorded-future) - [Recorded Future vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/recorded-future-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Recorded Future vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-recorded-future) - [Recorded Future vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-recorded-future) - [Recorded Future vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-recorded-future) - [Recorded Future vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-recorded-future) - [Recorded Future vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-recorded-future) ### 7. [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/products/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm/reviews) By Cisco **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 217 Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm) **Compare Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) with other alternatives:** - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-scrut-automation) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-cloudbees) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-recorded-future) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-intruder) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-pentera) - [Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm) ### 8. [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) By Intruder **Average Rating:** 4.8/5 **Total Reviews:** 208 Intruder is a proactive security monitoring platform for internet-facing systems. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Intruder is: - More expensive - Easier to admin - Better at meeting requirements Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-intruder) **Compare Intruder with other alternatives:** - [Intruder vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Intruder vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-scrut-automation) - [Intruder vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-intruder) - [Intruder vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Intruder vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-intruder) - [Intruder vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-recorded-future) - [Intruder vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-intruder) - [Intruder vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-pentera) - [Intruder vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-intruder) ### 9. [Pentera](https://www.g2.com/products/pentera/reviews) By Pentera **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 174 Pentera is the category leader for Automated Security Validation, allowing every organization to test with ease the integrity of all cybersecurity layers, unfolding true, current security exposures at any moment, at any scale. Thousands of security professionals and service providers around the world use Pentera to guide remediation and close security gaps before they are exploited. For more info visit: pentera.io. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Pentera is: - More expensive Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management), [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-pentera) **Compare Pentera with other alternatives:** - [Pentera vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Pentera vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-scrut-automation) - [Pentera vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/cloudbees-vs-pentera) - [Pentera vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Pentera vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-pentera) - [Pentera vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/pentera-vs-recorded-future) - [Pentera vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm-vs-pentera) - [Pentera vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-pentera) - [Pentera vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-pentera) ### 10. [Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/products/check-point-exposure-management/reviews) By Check Point Software Technologies **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 169 Cyberint is now a Check Point Company. Its impactful intelligence solution combines cyber threat intelligence, external attack surface management, brand protection, and digital supply chain intelligence into a single, powerful solution. By leveraging autonomous discovery of all of an organization’s external-facing assets, coupled with open, deep & dark web intelligence, the solution enables cybersecurity teams to accelerate the detection and disruption of their most pressing cyber risks. Global customers, including Fortune 500 leaders across all major market verticals, rely on us to prevent, detect, investigate, and remediate phishing, malware, fraud, brand abuse, data leaks, external vulnerabilities, and more, ensuring continuous external protection from cyber threats. Reviewers say compared to CODA Footprint, Check Point Exposure Management is: - More expensive - Easier to admin Categories in common with CODA Footprint: [Attack Surface Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/attack-surface-management), [Risk-Based Vulnerability Management](https://www.g2.com/categories/risk-based-vulnerability-management) **Compare:** [CODA Footprint vs Check Point Exposure Management](https://www.g2.com/compare/coda-footprint-vs-check-point-exposure-management) **Compare Check Point Exposure Management with other alternatives:** - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-wiz-wiz) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Scrut Automation](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-scrut-automation) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs CloudBees](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cloudbees) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-tenable-nessus) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Arctic Wolf](https://www.g2.com/compare/arctic-wolf-vs-check-point-exposure-management) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Recorded Future](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-recorded-future) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-cisco-vulnerability-management-formerly-kenna-vm) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-intruder) - [Check Point Exposure Management vs Pentera](https://www.g2.com/compare/check-point-exposure-management-vs-pentera) ## Explore Articles - [What is the most reliable file recovery software based on reviews from mid-market organizations without disrupting existing workflows?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-most-reliable-file-recovery-software-based-on-reviews-from-mid-market-organizations-without-disrupting-existing-workflows) - [Which file converter tools have security and data protection compliance built in so legal and IT teams can approve them without a lengthy review process?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-file-converter-tools-have-security-and-data-protection-compliance-built-in-so-legal-and-it-teams-can-approve-them-without-a-lengthy-review-process) - [Best AI tools for due diligence in M&A](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-best-ai-tools-for-due-deligence-in-m-a) - [AI Regulations in the EU](https://www.g2.com/articles/industry-impact-of-ai-regulations-in-the-eu) - [Best SMS marketing software for small businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-sms-marketing-tools-actually-work-for-small-businesses) - [Best biometric solutions for facial recognition login](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-biometric-solutions-for-facial-recognition-login) ## Spotlight Categories - [Customer Service Automation Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/customer-service-automation) - [A/B Testing Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/a-b-testing-tools) - [Expense Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/expense-management)