What do you like best about Caplena?
Caplena, as a business, is a really good partner. What I mean by partner is that we have mutually helped each other to grow. They are very interested in the feedback of their users to make the product work better for the user needs.
We've been using Caplena for several years and they have tremendously improved both the interface and the backend magic. Over that time the reports are very easy to use but the most commonly used feature in my organization is the Insights Agent. Even directly in Microsoft Teams users can ask questions of the data and get insights that might have been hard to find just looking through reports.
Another cool feature is the smart columns, where you're able to either have formulas act on the existing columns or have an LLM act on the existing columns so that you can add new layers to the analysis. That would previously have needed a data engineer to make happen and you can just do it directly in the interface. You could add a column that flags if a certain thing has happened, or if a particular location is mentioned, or which competitors are mentioned, etc. The integrations that I've used are excellent. I've tried Google Maps, Google Play Store, and Apple App Store and all of those worked very, very well. You're able to import those data either into new projects or combine them with existing projects.
The topic assignment works really well for creating a codebook. You can have the LLM suggest themes, or you can bring your own, or you can combine the two. You're able to review how those topics were actually assigned, which further trains the model. You're able to see how high the AI's confidence is in its ability to classify each of the different topics that you have in your notebook. The support team is fantastic. They have always been very quick to respond to questions, requests, and issues. They escalate it internally as needed and they follow up and make sure that things are resolved.
As far as pricing goes I've looked at many vendors in this space and I think that the price that we got from Caplena is completely fair, especially considering their speed of innovation and development. You get many features that many other vendors are talking about, hoping to implement in their roadmap. Those are actually already available on Caplena and they're working on new things all the time, which doesn't change your price. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Caplena?
One of the challenges about working with a company that innovates so much is that some of the new features are not super compatible with the old features that we started with. Since we've been with Caplena for a while, for example, they introduced an LLM topic assignment that is much more accurate and is much more "human". It took a very long time to implement that on our main project, both because there are millions of rows of data and because it was not backwards compatible. Caplena didn't really think about their existing customers and migrating them to the new feature set, but rather about rolling out the new feature and getting new customers on it. It would have been a very powerful improvement to our project but it was not available to us for a long time.
I wish that the pricing could be more modular because, yes, Caplena rolls out tons of new features but many of them we don't need and we don't use. It would be nice if I could choose which features are covered in my plan.
Finally one thing that would be useful for me administrating the platform is to be able to see which users are using the Insights agent from within Microsoft Teams and how often.
There is something of a hack workaround for this. If you tell your users that they have to have an account to log in and then they set up the Microsoft Teams connection, you're able to get a better view (but not perfect) of which users are using the Insights agent from within Microsoft Teams.
As I found out, though, users just add the bot in Microsoft Teams and don't create an account first. They just show up as an anonymous user in the platform and I have no count of anonymous users. They're just shown as "anonymous users have done this many queries," sort of thing. But I would like to be able to enforce that I can see which users are really using it and how often, because then I can communicate to those users about changes, features, or ideas to do it better or that sort of thing. Understanding whom my most active users are is just generally beneficial. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.