Azure Text to Speech API Reviews & Product Details

It is a very developer-friendly and user-friendly application. They providing very good quality technical support. The GUI is good compared to other speech application.

The product developing team will provide new updates and that update they were maximum include the new features. Also, support so many languages comparing to other application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some times we are facing trouble to clearly understand the audio message. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This is what I call a transformation-to-the-future technology. This was helpful in what I was trying to achieve. Microsoft team has come a long way. A decade ago we were used to robotic sounds and now this is improving. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I couldn't get a few of the parameters such as list of sounds and also sometimes the audio just stopped working. But I still recommend it though. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Azure API provided the choice to modify the voice component of the speech API by providing multiple accents to support regional dialect tone , the consistency to provide smooth human like words.

Support for WAV and Opus format of audio across web. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Certain functions are not properly described with the necessary parameters , additional fee to develop custom model on the audio sample to support localization Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The fluency in the interaction with the Speech, most of the speech was really understandable, even with the questions and exclamatory expressions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The automation or capability of integrate with other NLP services, for example to add interaction with the user. Also to speech technical words. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From inputting the text to getting the speech output and saving the file to use, the whole process is simple and hassle free. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing much here to dislike. One thing I would like to suggest is to support more languages. And the accent could be more realistic Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The SDK supports tuning of different parameters as well as creating custom voices. Furthermore, the availability of a free monthly package to start a free trial without getting billed and paying for what I use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The voice sounds digital compared to other competitors and to the recent advancements in text-to-speech such as Amazon Polly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The clear and concise documentation and straight forward API Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The lack of different languages client libraries, python isn't my main development language so I had to wrap the API calls myself. It is not a very big problem, thought it would be better if there were clients for NodeJs for example. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that the API has multi-language support. This enables applications to server multiple countries. it is easy to use and well documented. It has definitely come a long way. I like the appropriate pausing between sentences and human-like voices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The accents are not quite there yet and can use some improvement. Some additional language could also be added. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The easy of integration, the reliability of the service and the fast responses, also it’s provides a variety of voices to select, it can interacting like a human Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It could be better if they provide a way to customize an output voices Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In many situations developers can apply this API in voice enable applications. Training model can be very easy using this API. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think more improvements are needed. Specially while working with Android. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.