The gain in time and agility in obtaining results compared to standard FEA is the biggest difference. It allows for more fluidity between design and s

The embedded modeling tools create an easy to use workspace to render the results for FEA and Fatique. While there are some areas that have room for

I like the simplicity of SimSolid. Also, the results are quite correlate with fea results so I go on use the simsolid for first couple of iteration un

That it is so simple and easy to learn how to use, no unneccessary functions. It is working very well to add files for simulation/calculation to SimSo

There are two major advantages. First, you can bring in large assemblies like an dozer or excavator frame and it will easlily connect or determine t

1. Meshless 2.Most of the analysis can be done easily without much effort. 3.Can be done in very less time. 4.Gives 95% accurate results compared t

There are two major advantages. First, you can bring in large assemblies like an dozer or excavator frame and it will easlily connect or determine t

1. Meshless 2.Most of the analysis can be done easily without much effort. 3.Can be done in very less time. 4.Gives 95% accurate results compared t

There are two major advantages. First, you can bring in large assemblies like an dozer or excavator frame and it will easlily connect or determine t

1. Meshless 2.Most of the analysis can be done easily without much effort. 3.Can be done in very less time. 4.Gives 95% accurate results compared t

There are two major advantages. First, you can bring in large assemblies like an dozer or excavator frame and it will easlily connect or determine t

I am thoroughly impressed with SimSolid's speed and low processing power consumption, even when solving complex problems. The interface is well-organi

I am thoroughly impressed with SimSolid's speed and low processing power consumption, even when solving complex problems. The interface is well-organi

It is very capable as it can handle levels of detail and number of parts that other traditional softwares just wouldn't be able to. It is really qucik

1) Non-linear with separating contacts are not yet supported. 2) After certain number of steps, when the geometry starts showing large deflection, the

Its a black box. No output files are generated. Need to add some real time outpfiles to give the user feedback and also to learn more about the behind

Hard to understand how to optimize solves for accuracy - unclear UI. Documentation on advanced features is unclear, there are several features I have

As of 2025, based on my real-life experience in the mining industry, dealing with welded steel structures, it works only with smaller models. As soon

Hard to understand how to optimize solves for accuracy - unclear UI. Documentation on advanced features is unclear, there are several features I have

1) Non-linear with separating contacts are not yet supported. 2) After certain number of steps, when the geometry starts showing large deflection, the

Relatively complicate to estimate the calculation error, pure ability to take in account a stress risers and unexistent CAD modification tools.

As of 2025, based on my real-life experience in the mining industry, dealing with welded steel structures, it works only with smaller models. As soon

Relatively complicate to estimate the calculation error, pure ability to take in account a stress risers and unexistent CAD modification tools.

Full blackbox, missing mesh import/ fem native as file, apart of CAD

Full blackbox, missing mesh import/ fem native as file, apart of CAD

In some case, could be interesting to have a mesh