Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare JFrog and npm 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
No pricing available
JFrog
Star Rating
(105)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $150.00 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansnpm
Star Rating
(85)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (62.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about npmSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that npm excels in Package Management with a score of 9.2, making it a preferred choice for developers who prioritize efficient package handling. In contrast, JFrog's package management capabilities, while solid, do not reach the same level of user satisfaction.
- Reviewers mention that npm's Ease of Setup is rated at 9.1, indicating a user-friendly onboarding process. JFrog, with a score of 8.5, is perceived as slightly more complex to set up, which may deter some small businesses.
- G2 users highlight npm's superior Extensibility with a score of 9.3, allowing for greater customization and integration with other tools. JFrog, while extensible, does not offer the same level of flexibility, which can limit its adaptability in diverse environments.
- Users on G2 report that JFrog shines in Vulnerability Checks, scoring 8.1, which is crucial for enterprises focused on security. npm, with a score of 8.2, is effective but may not provide the same depth of security features that larger organizations require.
- Reviewers mention that npm's Quality of Support is rated at 8.4, which is slightly lower than JFrog's 8.5. This suggests that while both products offer good support, JFrog may have a slight edge in customer service responsiveness.
- Users say that JFrog's Automation features, with a score of 8.7, are particularly beneficial for enterprises looking to streamline their workflows. npm, while offering automation capabilities, does not match the comprehensive automation tools provided by JFrog.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
JFrog
PRO
Starting at $150.00
Per Month
Automated Artifact and Container Registry for Individuals & Small teams
- Universal Binary Repository
- Release Lifecycle Management
- Unlimited Docker Hub Pulls
npm
No pricing availableFree Trial
JFrog
Free Trial is available
npm
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
77
8.9
67
Ease of Use
8.2
78
8.9
67
Ease of Setup
8.2
46
9.0
18
Ease of Admin
8.5
39
8.5
16
Quality of Support
8.4
67
8.4
53
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
38
9.0
12
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
71
8.4
64
Features by Category
Administration
7.1
8
Not enough data
6.9
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
Functionality
7.5
8
Not enough data
7.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Processes
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
7.3
8
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
IT Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Deployment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Operations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Management
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.4
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
6.7
7
9.2
58
6.5
8
8.8
54
6.0
7
8.2
51
5.8
6
8.1
52
Management
7.9
8
8.7
51
6.9
7
8.5
51
4.0
5
8.4
48
6.2
7
8.2
49
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
6.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
Functionality
6.1
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
6.0
10
Not enough data
Processes
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.0
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
Functionality
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
Management
7.7
10
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
6.7
9
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
JFrog and npm are categorized as Repository Management
Unique Categories
JFrog is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, MLOps Platforms, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Application Release Orchestration, Container Registry, Version Control Hosting, Continuous Delivery, Continuous Integration, and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
npm has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
JFrog
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
npm
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.0%
Computer Software
14.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Computer & Network Security
6.0%
Internet
3.0%
Other
37.0%
Computer Software
40.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Hospital & Health Care
6.3%
Program Development
3.8%
Other
23.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
JFrog has no discussions with answers
Is there any way to exclude files that are not in use by project
1 Comment
CA
You should be able to add in packages as a dependencies in your package.json file. Specify which ones are for the project and which are...Read more
What is the best way to name a library.
1 Comment
AS
Without capitalizations, and if it's just a package without any symbols (!.,/@#$%^*&(), etc)
Read more
What is NPM for?
1 Comment
AS
The NPM registry is for uploading packages to their registry for public usage of the package.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
