Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv) and Comodo Firewall 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (77.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv)
Star Rating
(92)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv)Comodo Firewall
Star Rating
(38)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (77.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Comodo FirewallSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual excels in Logging and Reporting with a score of 9.7, providing detailed insights that help in compliance and security audits, while Comodo Firewall's score of 7.7 indicates it may lack the depth in reporting features that some users desire.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's Virtual Private Network (VPN) functionality is robust, scoring 9.6, which is particularly beneficial for remote work scenarios, whereas Comodo Firewall's score of 7.2 suggests it may not meet the needs of users looking for a strong VPN solution.
- G2 users highlight the superior Application Gateway capabilities of Cisco Secure Firewall, scoring 9.2, which allows for better application-level security management compared to Comodo's score of 7.5, indicating a potential gap in application security features.
- Users on G2 report that Cisco's Intrusion Prevention system is highly effective, with a score of 9.4, providing a strong defense against threats, while Comodo's score of 8.1 suggests it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Cisco's Policy Management is user-friendly, scoring 8.8, which facilitates easier configuration and management of security policies, while Comodo's score of 7.5 indicates that users may find it less intuitive.
- Users say that Cisco Secure Firewall's Quality of Support is exceptional, with a score of 9.1, often praised for responsiveness and helpfulness, whereas Comodo Firewall's score of 8.0 suggests that users may experience varying levels of support quality.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv)
No pricing availableComodo Firewall
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv)
No trial information availableComodo Firewall
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.8
82
8.6
27
Ease of Use
8.1
81
8.6
27
Ease of Setup
7.4
50
8.9
9
Ease of Admin
7.7
48
9.1
9
Quality of Support
9.1
73
8.0
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
46
8.3
8
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
82
7.8
26
Features by Category
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
9.5
6
Not enough data
Prevention
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Detection
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.9
12
7.5
8
9.6
12
7.7
8
9.2
11
7.5
8
9.2
11
7.5
8
Agentic AI - Firewall Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.6
13
7.2
6
9.3
12
7.9
8
9.4
12
8.1
8
8.9
12
7.7
8
Monitoring
9.2
10
6.7
6
9.2
12
7.6
7
9.5
13
8.1
7
9.4
12
7.9
7
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Firewall
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv) and Comodo Firewall are categorized as Firewall Software
Unique Categories
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv) is categorized as AWS Marketplace and Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Comodo Firewall has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Comodo Firewall
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Telecommunications
6.8%
Higher Education
6.8%
Computer Software
5.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.5%
Other
58.0%
Information Technology and Services
17.1%
Telecommunications
5.7%
Retail
5.7%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
5.7%
Consumer Services
5.7%
Other
60.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Virtual (formerly NGFWv) has no discussions with answers
Comodo Firewall has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
