Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Nuix Neo Investigations
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.6% of reviews)
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
Star Rating
(68)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (46.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Star Rating
(66)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (35.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)Summary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that FireEye Network Security and Forensics excels in Intrusion Prevention with a score of 9.2, highlighting its robust capabilities in detecting and mitigating threats effectively, while Check Point IPS also performs well but slightly lower at 9.0.
- Reviewers mention that the ease of use for Check Point IPS is rated higher at 9.1 compared to FireEye's 8.0, indicating that users find Check Point's interface more intuitive and user-friendly.
- G2 users note that FireEye's strong focus on incident management, particularly with features like Incident Alerts and Incident Reporting, provides a comprehensive approach to threat response, which some users feel is more advanced than Check Point's offerings.
- Users on G2 highlight that Check Point IPS has a superior score in compliance at 9.0, suggesting that it may be better suited for organizations with stringent regulatory requirements compared to FireEye.
- Reviewers say that FireEye's automation features, particularly in Response Automation, are highly praised for their effectiveness in streamlining incident responses, while Check Point's automation capabilities are seen as less comprehensive.
- Users report that FireEye's product direction is viewed positively at 7.7, but Check Point IPS shines with a higher score of 9.2, indicating a stronger confidence in its future development and feature enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
No pricing availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No pricing availableFree Trial
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
No trial information availableTrellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
41
8.6
53
Ease of Use
8.5
42
8.2
53
Ease of Setup
8.1
35
7.9
19
Ease of Admin
8.4
33
8.2
20
Quality of Support
8.9
40
8.0
50
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
32
8.2
19
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
38
7.6
54
Features by Category
Prevention
9.1
33
8.9
18
8.9
35
8.8
18
8.4
31
8.1
18
8.6
34
8.4
18
8.4
33
8.1
15
Detection
9.1
34
8.5
17
8.9
35
8.8
19
9.1
34
8.6
18
Administration
9.0
32
8.2
16
8.6
34
8.3
18
8.2
33
7.6
17
Generative AI
7.9
21
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
18
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Incident Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Remediation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) and Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) are categorized as Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems (IDPS)
Unique Categories
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) has no unique categories
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) is categorized as Digital Forensics and Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR)
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
24.1%
Information Technology and Services
19.0%
Financial Services
13.8%
Banking
5.2%
Telecommunications
3.4%
Other
34.5%
Information Technology and Services
15.6%
Financial Services
9.4%
Government Administration
4.7%
Education Management
4.7%
Computer Software
4.7%
Other
60.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
Check Point Quantum Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) has no discussions with answers
Trellix Network Detection and Response (NDR) has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
