Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Azure Load Balancer and Progress Kemp LoadMaster

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer
Star Rating
(30)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (35.7% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Load Balancer
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Star Rating
(202)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (51.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Progress Kemp LoadMaster
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Azure Load Balancer excels in its integration with other Azure services, making it a seamless choice for businesses already utilizing the Azure ecosystem. In contrast, reviewers mention that Kemp LoadMaster offers more flexibility in deployment options, including on-premises and cloud environments.
  • Reviewers say that Azure Load Balancer has a slightly steeper learning curve, with an ease of setup score of 8.9, while Kemp LoadMaster shines with a score of 9.1, indicating a more user-friendly setup process.
  • Users on G2 highlight that Azure Load Balancer's quality of support is rated at 8.6, which some users find lacking compared to Kemp LoadMaster's impressive score of 9.3, where reviewers mention responsive and knowledgeable support staff.
  • G2 users report that both products meet requirements equally well, with a score of 9.3, but users mention that Kemp LoadMaster provides more advanced features like Layer 7 load balancing and SSL offloading, which are crucial for complex applications.
  • Reviewers mention that Azure Load Balancer has a strong product direction with a positive score of 9.7, indicating confidence in future updates, while Kemp LoadMaster's score of 9.1 suggests a solid but slightly less enthusiastic outlook on product evolution.
  • Users say that while both products cater well to mid-market needs, Kemp LoadMaster's higher percentage of reviews from this segment (53.5%) suggests a stronger alignment with mid-market user requirements compared to Azure Load Balancer's 36.0%.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Load Balancer
No pricing available
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
No pricing available
Free Trial
Azure Load Balancer
No trial information available
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
22
9.2
144
Ease of Use
8.8
22
9.1
144
Ease of Setup
9.5
10
8.9
136
Ease of Admin
9.4
9
9.2
128
Quality of Support
8.2
22
9.2
136
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
9
9.4
139
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
22
9.1
137
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.1
38
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.6
38
Not enough data
7.8
38
Not enough data
7.2
38
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
8.4
37
Not enough data
8.3
36
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
7.7
37
Not enough data
7.9
36
Not enough data
8.1
37
Not enough data
7.9
37
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Azure Load Balancer and Progress Kemp LoadMaster are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer has no unique categories
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
35.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
35.7%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.6%
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
10.5%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
51.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
37.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer
Computer Software
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Financial Services
7.1%
Computer & Network Security
7.1%
Telecommunications
3.6%
Other
25.0%
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Information Technology and Services
12.1%
Financial Services
7.4%
Hospital & Health Care
6.8%
Computer & Network Security
4.7%
Government Administration
4.2%
Other
64.7%
Alternatives
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
NetScaler
NetScaler
Add NetScaler
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Google Cloud Load Balancing
Add Google Cloud Load Balancing
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Alternatives
HAProxy
HAProxy
Add HAProxy
F5 NGINX
Nginx
Add F5 NGINX
Traefik
Traefik
Add Traefik
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Add F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM)
Discussions
Azure Load Balancer
Azure Load Balancer Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Load Balancer has no discussions with answers
Progress Kemp LoadMaster
Progress Kemp LoadMaster Discussions
Can Kemp integrate with automation scripts?
2 Comments
NS
Hi John, The LoadMaster can be scripted to do things via PowerShell or an API wrapper such as java or anything else that can execute API commands. From...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Progress Kemp LoadMaster has no more discussions with answers