Users report that OpenText EnCase Forensic excels in incident reporting, with a score of 8.1, while Autopsy shines in remediation suggestions with a score of 8.0, indicating that Autopsy may provide more actionable insights for users looking to address issues.
Reviewers mention that Autopsy offers superior email analysis capabilities, scoring 9.3 compared to EnCase's 7.1, suggesting that users who prioritize email forensics may find Autopsy more effective for their needs.
G2 users highlight that OpenText EnCase Forensic has a strong product direction with a positive score of 8.7, while Autopsy achieves a perfect score of 10.0, indicating that Autopsy may be more aligned with future developments and user needs.
Users on G2 note that while both products provide memory analysis, Autopsy's score of 8.8 significantly outperforms EnCase's 7.2, suggesting that Autopsy may offer more robust tools for analyzing volatile data.
Reviewers say that OpenText EnCase Forensic has a lower score of 6.7 for incident alerts, while Autopsy scores 7.3, indicating that users may find Autopsy's alerting features more responsive and useful in real-time scenarios.
Users report that EnCase's quality of support is rated at 7.8, which is lower than Autopsy's 8.5, suggesting that users may experience better customer service and support with Autopsy.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Autopsy
No pricing available
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
No pricing available
Free Trial
Autopsy
No trial information available
OpenText Forensic (EnCase)
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
12
8.0
9
Ease of Use
8.2
12
7.6
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.5
11
7.8
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.