Best Security Compliance Software for Small Business - Page 4

How Many Security Compliance Software Products Does G2 Track?

Total Products under this Category: 359

Category Stats (Sep 2026)

Average Rating: 4.63/5 (↑0.02 vs Aug 2026) The average rating of products in this category, based on all submitted ratings
Top Trending Product: LowerPlane (+3.76%) - Among all products in this category, LowerPlane recorded the largest rating increase compared to last month

Last updated: September 01, 2026

How Does G2 Rank Security Compliance Software Products?

Why You Can Trust G2's Software Rankings:

30 Analysts and Data Experts
24,600+ Authentic Reviews
359+ Products
Unbiased Rankings

G2's software rankings are built on verified user reviews, rigorous moderation, and a consistent research methodology maintained by a team of analysts and data experts. Each product is measured using the same transparent criteria, with no paid placement or vendor influence. While reviews reflect real user experiences, which can be subjective, they offer valuable insight into how software performs in the hands of professionals. Together, these inputs power the G2 Score, a standardized way to compare tools within every category.

G2 Grid® for Security Compliance Software

Highlighted products: Vanta, Sprinto, Secureframe, Drata, Scytale, Scrut Automation, Thoropass, and Ubuntu.

Underlying data: [Grid® JSON](https://www.g2.com/categories/security-compliance/grids.json?focus%5B%5D=vanta&focus%5B%5D=sprinto-inc&focus%5B%5D=secureframe&focus%5B%5D=drata&focus%5B%5D=scytale-g2&focus%5B%5D=scrut-automation&focus%5B%5D=thoropass&focus%5B%5D=ubuntu&segment=small-business)

Cyrisma

Cyrisma helps MSPs and MSSPs turn cyber risk and compliance into revenue. Its unified platform combines vulnerability management, data and asset discovery, compliance tracking, secure configuration, and dark web monitoring into one continuous experience - enabling partners to identify, prioritize, and remediate cyber risk efficiently. With executive-ready reporting, risk monetization insights, and elegant visuals, Cyrisma helps MSPs demonstrate measurable value, strengthen client relationships, and scale their security services profitably.

Average Rating: 4.6/5.0

Total Reviews: 60

How Do G2 Users Rate Cyrisma?

Has the product been a good partner in doing business?: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.4/10)
Ease of Use: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
Ease of Admin: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.9/10)
Quality of Support: 9.2/10 (Category avg: 9.3/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Cyrisma?

Seller: Cyrisma
Company Website:
Year Founded: 2018
HQ Location: Rochester, NY
Twitter: @Cyrisma_USA
43 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page: www.linkedin.com
14 employees on LinkedIn®

Who Uses This Product?

Who Uses This: CEO
Top Industries: Information Technology and Services, Computer & Network Security
Company Size: 75% Small, 22% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Cyrisma?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros

Users value the time-saving integration of Cyrisma, streamlining cybersecurity processes and enhancing overall efficiency.
Users value the ease of use of Cyrisma, benefiting from its intuitive interface and seamless integration.
Users value the fantastic customer support from Cyrisma, noting its helpfulness and product improvement initiatives.
Users value the actionable vulnerability intelligence and integrated patch management features of Cyrisma for efficiency and effectiveness.
Users appreciate CYRISMA for its actionable vulnerability intelligence, making it easy to identify and address critical security issues.

Cons

Users find a lack of essential features, particularly in UI navigation, data correlation, and patch management capabilities.
Users find Cyrisma to be not user-friendly, struggling with navigation, deployment, and overall support for their needs.
Users report limited flexibility in Cyrisma, especially with data scanning and agent deployment, hindering efficiency.
Users highlight the need for improvements in the poor interface design, which affects navigation and usability.
Users find navigation challenging, with a non-intuitive interface that complicates connecting information across modules.