SAMMY Pricing Overview

At Conquest Security, our GRC practice focuses on designing, implementing, and sustaining Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) that help organizations manage risk, demonstrate compliance, and continuously improve their cybersecurity maturity. We use SAMMY as a core platform to support NIST CSF–based programs, ISO/IEC 27001 implementations, and CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 readiness as a CMMC Registered Practitioner Organization (RPO).

ISO/IEC 27001 and CMMC both require more than documented controls. They require operational discipline, defined responsibilities, and evidence of sustained execution. SAMMY provides a practical platform for documenting control implementation, assigning ownership, tracking risk treatment actions, and maintaining evidence over time. For our CMMC Level 1 and Level 2 readiness work, this is critical. We can clearly show how practices are implemented, monitored, and sustained rather than assembled as one-time compliance artifacts.

SAMMY brings together assessments, control libraries, and evidence tracking in a single system. This integration is particularly valuable for organizations that align enterprise risk management, NIST CSF outcomes, ISO/IEC 27001, and CMMC practices. It reduces duplication, improves traceability, and supports consistent results across internal reviews, readiness assessments, and external audits. From an ISMS perspective, this directly supports continuous monitoring and management review activities.

The Codific team demonstrates a strong practical understanding of cybersecurity frameworks and real-world GRC implementation challenges. Their support reflects how organizations actually build and operate CSF-aligned programs, implement ISO/IEC 27001, and prepare for CMMC assessments. This domain expertise accelerates onboarding and improves long-term adoption, particularly for small and mid-sized organizations without dedicated internal GRC teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAMMY is designed to support structured, framework-driven cybersecurity programs, so organizations get the most value when they approach it with an Information Security Management System mindset. Teams that are early in their GRC maturity may need some initial guidance to fully align their processes, roles, and documentation with the platform. In our experience, when SAMMY is implemented alongside clear governance and advisory support, this upfront alignment quickly turns into a long-term strength. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAMMY’s strongest quality is its principled alignment with OWASP SAMM, delivered through a clear, guided interview workflow and automatic scoring. The structured questionnaires, embedded calculations and scorecards streamline workshops and keep assessments consistent across teams. In practice, this reduces preparation time and helps stakeholders focus on evidence and decisions rather than mechanics. The ability to export results in a benchmark‑friendly format is particularly helpful when we collaborate on maturity baselines and share anonymized insights with community initiatives.

We also appreciate the secure, role‑based access and multi‑factor onboarding, which supports our compliance mindset while keeping the tool accessible to non‑specialists. Coordinating licenses and invitations for new analysts has been straightforward and allows us to spin up working sessions quickly.

Overall, SAMMY offers a well‑balanced combination of methodology fidelity, operational efficiency, and pragmatic outputs that are easy to discuss with engineering and management alike. Its consistent structure helps us compare teams fairly, prioritize improvements, and connect assessment findings to actionable roadmaps without losing traceability.

Also, the team is very reactive and several times I've seen features that I requested being implemented in a few weeks! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While SAMMY is effective, there are a few areas that could improve the user experience. Account lifecycle flows can be fragile at times (rarely to be honnest), which interrupts onboarding for busy project teams.

From a reporting perspective, the standardized scorecard is useful, but the layout and customization options feel limited for some audiences, richer templating (configurable narratives, visualizations, risk groupings,...) would help tailor deliverables to different stakeholders without post‑processing.

None of these points are blockers, and they do not diminish the value of the core product. Addressing them would simply make SAMMY more resilient in complex enterprise environments and further accelerate our facilitation during assessments Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.