Cornerstone Talentlink Reviews & Product Details

It helps our team manage our application pool for a full 360 hiring process. Its a software with a lot of features that definitely is helpful for recruiters Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

May take some time to learn every feature, but overall worth it Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Flexibility of the application form. Can configure different recruitment processes depending on the job you are recruiting to. TalentLink tries to keep up with recruiting trends. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Developments can overlook that managers do not spend much time in recruitment software, there could be better processes for users who recruit very ad hoc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Experience for candidates, navigation for recruiters and managers, Analytics reports, shortcuts in the menu. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Permissions and access cannot be controlled like in SABA Cloud. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This tool made it extremely easy to track our candidates. Firstly, with its customizable headings: these allowed you to choose things such as date of birth and/or university to be shown before viewing the applicants resume. In my role, I was recruiting for interns which meant they had to be in school. Between looking at the age and the school they were attending, I was able to already kindly reject the individuals who didn’t fit into the candidate profile by being in school. Absolutely a huge time saver!!

What was also a great aspect was being able to view comments regarding particulate candidates who had potentially applied at an earlier time for another role. Sometimes the notes from the earlier application were the deciding factors for whether a person would be considered or not for a role. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The way I had to manually enter all of the job descriptions. At the time, I had to type everything in section by section. It would have been ideal to have a system where you could upload a word doc or pdf and have it build itself via the doc. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

That you can see clearly all roles that candidates have applied for and how far they have progressed in each application in the past Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Can be buggy and requires a lot of communication in a team of what your processes are for future reviews/audits to be consistent Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to take contact with their group in order to have a demo trial version in the early stage of our software selection project. After a short video conference based on a well-conducted webinar, we decided to start with proving this tool. In the first steps, we faced an ease of use mainly regarding the screening of the candidates' curriculum vitae and the way to organize them in a proper way, so that our HR team could have a better work approach. In fact, we experimented with a subdivision of work in our HR team where each colleague follows up on a specific series or part of the curriculum vitae received and starts to perform a first screen between them. This has been a good experiment and brought to our company many feedbacks that we used for enhancing this part of the process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

During the screening of the curriculum vitae, we faced some minor visualization issues, but they were very few and very marginal, so we can't complain about that. However, the set of elements proposed is too limited to deeply assist with our first-level screening activity. In other words, this software could be more decisive if they would expand the set of elements to focus on. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Superb way of training that was unlike anything I’ve done before Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There was a learning curve since I had never used it beforehand Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lumeesse has some good functionality and when compared to other ATS platforms seems to have alot more partnerships and integrations in place than many other platforms Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The reason we moved away from Lumesse was primarily around system down time - there were occasionally (very occasionally, but that was enough!) when the system went down for a whole working day. The other issue was that the company was grown by acquisition so they seemed to have several code bases on the go rather than building out one cohesive platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Strengths: Multi-tenancy gives flexibility in multi-country or divisional structure where hierarchical relationships are required or separation of data is imperative.

Strong language support for multi-country deployments

Workable professional services groups that work across the globe. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

UI isn't great, lacks many features that more modern ATS's have such as offer letter modules, sophisticated approval routing, advanced database search features and others.

In many ways, it's a classic "old line" ATS that hasn't seen enough development in the last 5 years and has been surpassed by other systems with global ambitions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lumesse TalentLink's best feature is the ability to customize on an individual basis. My dashboard can include whichever parameters I find most useful, and my colleagues can have their own unique layouts as well. I like being able to tailor my homepage and add/remove apps and categories as needed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Where to begin... This ATS was mandated to us by our parent company and we couldn't be more disappointed. The only time we use TalentLink is for posting to our company website, but even that is a hassle because it is time consuming to comb through the resumes we receive within the platform. There are so many clicks involved to actually view each candidate's resume and then change their application status that it becomes a frustrating and annoying process. Another problem is that the functions are inconsistent. When my company rolled out this new software we were told that the system was a result of 2 previous iterations merging together, thus on one page you may be able to scroll down but on the other you must click a down arrow. It is also necessary to enter the same information in numerous times from one page to another. The details will only sometimes carry over. If I have a requisition in Chicago, not only will it refrain from auto-populating the obvious information to follow (this position is located in the Illinois, this position is located in the United States) but you will also have to re-enter this information on the actual job advertisement page, which is a separate entity. Speaking of which, updates made to a posting must be manually entered into both the "advertisement" as well as the "requisition" page. Why am I doubling my efforts here? There are far too many clicks and steps necessary to accomplish a simple task. We dislike this system so much that we designed our own ATS in SharePoint so we wouldn't have to use it any more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.