It's been two months since this profile received a new review
Leave a Review
Compare this with other toolsSave it to your board and evaluate your options side by side.
Save to board

QA.Tech Reviews & Product Details

Profile Status

This profile is currently managed by QA.Tech but has limited features.

Are you part of the QA.Tech team? Upgrade your plan to enhance your branding and engage with visitors to your profile!

Pricing

Pricing provided by QA.Tech.

Custom

Contact Us

Free Plan

Contact Us

QA.Tech Media

QA.Tech Demo - Release faster with no QA bottlenecks
AI testing removes QA as a shipping bottleneck. QA agents test your product like real users – with goals in mind, relying on UI behavior instead of brittle scripts or selectors. Get rid of the maintenance tax and match testing velocity to your team’s coding speed.
QA.Tech Demo - Catch issues instantly on your PR
Run tests on every pull request and catch issues before merging to power up shift-left teams. Catch bugs early in PRs and CI – not days later in QA or production.
QA.Tech Demo - Get the context. Get your devs’ time back.
AI agents record each step of a test, giving developers full context and logs to debug faster. No more pointless back-and-forth
to discover if that ping was a bug 
or a flake.
QA.Tech Demo - Stay efficient and keep moving fast
Get a clear view of test results and see what’s breaking, where, and why – without any noise.
Product Avatar Image

Have you used QA.Tech before?

Answer a few questions to help the QA.Tech community

QA.Tech Reviews (15)

Reviews

QA.Tech Reviews (15)

4.9
15 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews
Users consistently praise the product for its ease of use and seamless integration with existing workflows, allowing teams to automate testing without heavy technical expertise. The intuitive interface and responsive support enhance the overall experience, making it a valuable tool for improving testing efficiency. However, some users note that the AI can occasionally suggest irrelevant tests, requiring minor adjustments.

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
NW
QA Lead
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"AI-Powered testing that actually understands your app"
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

From seamless integration to intelligent test coverage, every aspect of the platform feels like it was built by people who truly understand the challenges of modern software testing.

User-friendly UI and the chat bot can give you any answers that you are looking for, but also a support that replying fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Things get developed and implemented fast, meaning you, as a customer wanting more and more Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jonathan R.
JR
CEO / Founder
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Finally a way to automate testing to focus on what matters"
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

We are running a saas where uptime is critical - so to us, testing is core. As a fast growing startup we finally found a easy way to automate our testing. And to do it in a scalable way vs previous more manual setup in cypress. QA tech helps us focus on the business, and shipping features - not maintaining tests. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Quite a new user - so have found any downsides yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Lucas M.
LM
Design lead
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"An excellent addition to a testing pipeline, simplifying QA and helping us identify errors earlier."
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

* End-to-end testing without the hefty time investment

* Middle path between human QA and static e2e tests like playwright

* Low threshold to get started, easy to implement

* Excellent customer service

* Simple integration with CI pipeline Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

* Some times auto-generated tests need manual tweaking

* High initial cost makes it less viable for some clients Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Daniel Mauno Pettersson of QA.Tech

Thank you, Lucas, for taking the time to review us! That means a lot!

Regarding the high initial cost, we have reworked our pricing model since you joined to fit clients of all sizes better!

Verified User in Marketing and Advertising
UM
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"QA Tech - the future is here!"
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

I like that it's intuitive to use. Capable product. Makes it easy to review and measure functionality in our product. Can't think of much else one would want for quality assurance for any web based application. Easy to implement. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Minor AI hallucinations at times, and visual UI bugs are not as easy to pick up on. Some suggested tests are not always needed, but likely a case by case kind of thing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rasmus F.
RF
GTM lead
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"A new way to test web apps!"
What do you like best about QA.Tech?

It's fully automated. All I had to do was give their agents access to my staging environment and then it handled the rest Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about QA.Tech?

Some more complex tests took slightly longer (a few minutes) the first time I ran them - but it seems to be going down Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing Options

Pricing provided by QA.Tech.

Custom

Contact Us

Free Plan

Contact Us

Pay as you go

Contact Us
QA.Tech Features
Test Feedback
Test History
Customization
Reliability
Thoroughness
Product Avatar Image
QA.Tech