Total Products under this Category: 103
Last updated: June 30, 2026
Why You Can Trust G2's Software Rankings:
G2's software rankings are built on verified user reviews, rigorous moderation, and a consistent research methodology maintained by a team of analysts and data experts. Each product is measured using the same transparent criteria, with no paid placement or vendor influence. While reviews reflect real user experiences, which can be subjective, they offer valuable insight into how software performs in the hands of professionals. Together, these inputs power the G2 Score, a standardized way to compare tools within every category.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise VMware Cloud Foundation for its integrated platform that simplifies management by unifying compute, storage, and networking. The automated lifecycle management significantly reduces operational complexity, making it easier to maintain hybrid cloud environments. However, many reviews note that the initial setup can be complex and the licensing costs are high, which may deter smaller organizations.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the stability and ease of use of VMware vSphere, highlighting its effectiveness in managing virtual environments and ensuring high availability. The intuitive interface and robust feature set simplify complex tasks, making it suitable for both small and large organizations. However, many reviews note that the licensing costs can be a significant barrier, particularly for smaller businesses.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise Ubuntu for its stability and reliability, making it a preferred choice for both beginners and experienced developers. The user-friendly interface and extensive community support enhance the overall experience, allowing for easy troubleshooting and customization. However, some users note that compatibility with certain proprietary software can be a challenge.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the flexibility and scalability of Google Compute Engine, highlighting its ability to quickly spin up customized virtual machines tailored to specific workloads. The seamless integration with other Google Cloud services enhances user experience, making deployment and management straightforward. However, many users note that the pricing structure can be complex and may lead to unexpected costs if not monitored closely.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and reliable performance of the SC// HyperCore Virtualization Suite, highlighting its intuitive interface that simplifies VM management and deployment. Many appreciate the strong support provided, which enhances their overall experience. A common limitation noted is the lack of advanced features compared to larger platforms, which may not suit all complex environments.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the stability and security of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, highlighting its reliability for enterprise environments and long-term support. Many appreciate the excellent support and documentation provided, which enhances their confidence in managing critical workloads. However, the high subscription costs are a common concern, particularly for smaller teams.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and centralized management of the Sangfor Cloud Platform, highlighting its ability to simplify complex IT operations and improve efficiency. The intuitive interface and robust support contribute to a positive experience, making it accessible even for those new to cloud environments. However, some users note limitations in third-party integration options, which could enhance its versatility.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and centralized management of Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure, highlighting how it simplifies daily operations by integrating compute, storage, and networking into one platform. The intuitive interface and automation features save significant time and reduce operational complexity, making it a reliable choice for IT teams. However, some users note that the licensing costs can be high, particularly for smaller organizations.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the product for its flexibility and scalability, allowing organizations to easily adjust resources based on demand. The seamless integration with other Azure services enhances management efficiency, making it a preferred choice for many. However, some users note that the pricing structure can be complex and potentially high for smaller businesses.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the product for its stability and ease of use, making it a reliable choice for enterprise environments. The robust support and efficient patching process enhance user satisfaction, allowing for smooth operation in critical workloads. However, some users note that licensing costs can be higher compared to other distributions.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and integration with Oracle products, highlighting how it simplifies the process of creating and managing virtual machines. Many appreciate its cost-effectiveness and the ability to run multiple operating systems seamlessly. However, some users note that the initial setup can be complex, which may pose challenges for beginners.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and flexibility of VirtualBox, highlighting its ability to run multiple operating systems seamlessly on a single machine. Many appreciate its intuitive setup process and the powerful features it offers for virtualization, making it ideal for both beginners and experienced users. However, some users note that it can be resource-intensive, leading to performance issues on lower-end machines.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and stability of VMware ESXi, highlighting its effectiveness in managing virtual machines and seamless integration with other applications. Many appreciate the comprehensive management tools that simplify server management, although some note that the licensing costs can be high, especially after recent changes.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the ease of use and scalability of Azure Virtual Machine Scale Sets, highlighting how quickly they can deploy and manage virtual machines. The platform's ability to automatically adjust resources based on demand is particularly valued, making it a reliable choice for businesses. However, some users note that the interface can be complex and may require a learning curve.
What do users say?
Users consistently praise the stability and reliability of IBM Power VM, highlighting its ability to efficiently manage resources and maintain performance under heavy workloads. The platform is valued for its secure and scalable environment, making it a preferred choice for mission-critical applications. However, many note that it can be complex for new users, requiring some experience to navigate effectively.
Server virtualization products, commonly referred to as hypervisors, are used by organizations to partition dedicated servers into scalable virtual instances called virtual private servers (VPS). Virtual private servers created with server virtualization technology can each host a unique operating system and be managed independently through an integrated hosting control panel. Organizations use server virtualization products to allocate server resources among virtual machines for workload optimization. Virtual machines created with virtualization platforms are often more flexible and reliable to manage than unpartitioned servers. Organizations that house and manage servers internally implement server virtualization solutions to reduce resource strains. Additionally, virtualization technology is commonly used by hosting service providers to offer VPS hosting services to their customers.
All virtualization technologies will serve the purpose of dividing a server into unique, virtual servers. Still, there are general differences depending on the virtualized server the user intends to implement.
Full virtualization
Full virtualization typically requires a hypervisor that communicates with, monitors, and relays resources between applications and the physical server. This type of virtualization can limit performance since both the physical server and the hypervisor require processing power to operate. These virtualization platforms typically utilize a single operating system. For example, a Linux hypervisor would create a virtual Linux server to run applications.
Para-virtualization
Para-virtualization operates similarly to full virtualization, but it integrates the entire network and any other para-virtualized servers. This interoperability reduces the processing needs.
OS-level virtualization
OS-level virtualization is another type of server virtualization that preprograms an operating system, allowing different applications running different operating systems to utilize the same physical resources simultaneously. This adds additional flexibility and portability when developing in the cloud or migrating legacy systems.
The following are some core features within server virtualization that can help users deploy, manage, and optimize virtualization server software:
Scaling: Scaling features help companies ramp up usage as growth occurs. This is done by allocating host resources to create additional instances quickly without requiring additional physical infrastructure.
Portability: Portability features provide an efficient server and storage migration functionality. This allows users to move applications from one server to another without having to reconfigure the entire server or application
Data recovery: Backup and recovery features provide backup functionality to store and protect redundant data sets and protect and restore a database. Recovery features will help revert systems in the case information is deleted or destroyed.
OS integration: Operating systems may determine how flexible or how portable a server is. Proper host integration will ensure an application runs smoothly with a variety of operating systems such as Windows, Linux, etc.
Resource management: Resource management features help people optimize physical and virtual resources across complex computing environments to ensure efficiency and availability at all times.
Performance management: Performance management features monitor virtual environments and physical hardware performance. Typically this is presented through a single-pane-of-glass dashboard.
Multi-server management: Multi-server management features allow users to manage, monitor, and configure resources across numerous virtualized servers. This can allow users to track and control resource spend and loads across entire networks.
Hosting: Hosting services of VPS allow customers to host an account on virtualized servers. The overall server resources are shared across all accounts, while some portions of those resources are reserved for each account.
Control panel: In a VPS, a control panel integrates hosting plans with either open-source or proprietary web hosting control panels. This helps to provide customers with a graphical user interface (GUI) that facilitates access to additional web hosting management features.
Supported operating systems: Various operating systems have their strengths and weaknesses concerning performance, security, and integration. Some VPS offerings allow customers to choose from multiple supported operating systems while others only support one.
Cost savings: Physical servers are costly and present an expensive barrier to entry for some companies. Smaller businesses may not have the staff to manage on-premises servers at all times. Server virtualization technologies help to expand the functionality of servers without requiring more infrastructure. This saves money in a similar way to any “as a service” offering. Server virtualization can expand the reach and functionality of a single server to achieve numerous business goals.
Free time: Physical servers require substantial time and effort not only to implement but also to maintain throughout their usage lifecycle. These servers must remain secure at all times, monitored for anomalous activities, and optimized for peak performance. Without the need to manage numerous servers on premises, IT staff can be more focused on expanding functionality, ensuring availability, and everything else they do to keep the modern world connected.
Flexibility and portability: Server virtualization platforms make it easier for companies to change the way they utilize servers without inhibiting availability or increased costs. Most of the flexibility comes from the consolidation of servers onto a single server, as well as the ability to add additional virtual servers
Alternatives to server virtualization products can replace this type of software, either partially or completely:
Virtual private servers (VPS): Virtual private servers (VPS) offerings are very similar to server virtualization tools. Many even deliver the same product, just as a managed service. Unlike server virtualization tools or a hypervisor, virtual private servers are housed and managed by an IT infrastructure provider of some kind. One thing to note is that VPS users may unknowingly share resources with other customers. It is likely easier to ensure peak performance while the user manages the virtual servers, but only if they have the staff and resources to do so.
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): IaaS offerings are a simple and dynamic way to access the cloud services a user needs. These products are offered by large cloud computing service providers who house and manage enormous data centers capable of delivering virtually any amount of resources. While customers need to manage everything in the cloud, or deployed through IaaS cloud services, the provider will be responsible for ensuring consistent availability and scalability, while protecting the physical servers themselves.
Virtual private cloud (VPC): VPC solutions are offered by similar service providers as IaaS solutions and rely on third-party infrastructure to deliver computing resources. They also operate similar to VPS solutions in delivering resources through the cloud. But the main difference here is the scope of what’s delivered. While virtualization solutions or virtual private servers help allocate the resources of a single server, VPC provides customers with the ability to manage multiple virtual machines and virtual servers within an isolated, private cloud computing environment. Still, it’s good to remember that this increased functionality will come at an increased cost.
Software solutions can come with their own set of challenges.
Performance issues: Without substantial experience managing virtual servers themselves, companies may struggle to optimize the performance of their servers and the individual virtual servers running atop them. Overworking a single server is also a possibility. Servers themselves, hypervisors, and additional virtualization will bog down a server and can slow performance.
Security: Companies running virtual servers on their infrastructure must be sure the resources are properly configured and protected at all times. Companies like this, as well as ones relying on managed virtual servers, must secure every piece of data, the networks, integrations, and anything else housed on the server.
Backup and disaster recovery: Virtual servers have no physical hard drive to rely on for storing or recovering data. The virtual machines running in a virtual environment must be backed up with a plan in place to prevent data loss and other negative side effects that may result from not implementing a backup and recovery plan.
Generally, server virtualization solutions and hypervisors will be used by companies that require more computing resources than they can house on site, but aren’t interested in more all-encompassing cloud-infrastructure solutions.
Startups and software companies: Server virtualization products are good for companies that require numerous servers operating simultaneously, but don’t want to invest in additional physical infrastructure and want to manage and configure servers themselves.
Web hosting providers: Web and other hosting providers often use server virtualization technologies to host numerous websites or applications on a single server. This helps simplify the management of these servers and isolates each virtual environment from one another.
Modernizing businesses: Companies hoping to migrate workloads and legacy systems to more modern computing environments should consider virtualization platforms as they make it easier to transfer virtual machines across servers and improve reliability in the case of a disaster.
The first step to purchasing a server virtualization solution is to outline the options. Companies should be sure whether they need a managed, shared, or dedicated solution. Additional and possibly obvious requirements should also include budgetary considerations, staffing limitations, and required integrations.
Create a long list
Once the requirements are outlined, buyers should rank the tools by priority and identify the ones with as many of the features that fit the budget window. It is recommended to restrict the list to products with desired features, pricing, data center locations, and deployment methods to identify a dozen or so options. For example, if the business needs managed virtual servers for less than $10,000 a year, half of the options may be eliminated.
Create a short list
Once the long list is limited to affordable products with the desired features, it’s time to search for third-party validation. At this point, for each tool, the buyer must analyze end-user reviews and analyst reports. Combining these specified factors should help rank options and eliminate poorly performing products.
Conduct demos
With the list narrowed down to three to five possible products, businesses can reach out to vendors and schedule demos. This will help the buyer get first-hand experience with the product, ask targeted questions, and gauge the vendors’ quality of service.
Choose a selection team
To choose a selection team, decision makers need to involve subject matter experts from all teams in the company that will use the system. When purchasing server virtualization platforms, this selection team primarily involves IT managers, developers, and security staff. Any manager or department-level leader should also include individuals managing any solution the product will be integrating with.
Negotiation
Depending on the maturity of the business, the seniority of the negotiation team when buying server virtualization solutions may vary. It is advisable to include relevant directors or managers in the security and IT departments as well as from any other cross-functional departments that may be impacted.
Final decision
If the company has a chief technology officer (CTO), that individual will likely make the decision. If not, companies must trust their security professionals’ ability to use and understand the product.
The variance in cost is very high with virtualization software for servers. Many of them are open source and simply require individuals to configure and maintain them. Others may factor in the price of a physical server, managed services, and other variables that will increase costs substantially more than the server virtualization product itself.