# Top 10 Indusface WAS Alternatives &amp; Competitors
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 68
The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Software solutions below are the most common alternatives that users and reviewers compare with Indusface WAS. Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking easily administered, reliable software solutions with vulnerability scan, test automation, and test automation. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Indusface WAS include reporting and security. The best overall Indusface WAS alternative is Burp Suite. Other similar apps like Indusface WAS are GitLab, Tenable Nessus, Wiz, and Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. Indusface WAS alternatives can be found in [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast) but may also be in [Vulnerability Scanner Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner) or [Version Control Hosting Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-hosting).


## Best Paid &amp; Free Alternatives to Indusface WAS
  - [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews)
  - [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)
  - [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)
  - [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)
  - [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews)
  - [Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/products/orca-security/reviews)
  - [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews)
  - [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews)
  - [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews)
  - [Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/products/aikido-security/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to Indusface WAS Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Indusface WAS stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current &amp; previous users in industries like Computer Software, Computer &amp; Network Security, and Marketing and Advertising, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews)
By PortSwigger
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 129
Burp Suite is a toolkit for web application security testing.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Burp Suite is:
- Easier to do business with
- Better at meeting requirements
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast), [Penetration Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/penetration-testing-tools), [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-indusface-was)
**Compare Burp Suite with other alternatives:**
- [Burp Suite vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-gitlab)
- [Burp Suite vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Burp Suite vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Burp Suite vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Burp Suite vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-orca-security)
- [Burp Suite vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-harness-platform)
- [Burp Suite vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-gearset-devops)
- [Burp Suite vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-intruder)
- [Burp Suite vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-burp-suite)

  ### 2. [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)
By GitLab Inc.
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 902
An open source web interface and source control platform based on Git.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, GitLab is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-indusface-was)
**Compare GitLab with other alternatives:**
- [GitLab vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-gitlab)
- [GitLab vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [GitLab vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [GitLab vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [GitLab vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-orca-security)
- [GitLab vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-harness-platform)
- [GitLab vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-gitlab)
- [GitLab vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-intruder)
- [GitLab vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-gitlab)

  ### 3. [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews)
By Tenable
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 305
From the beginning, we&#39;ve worked hand-in-hand with the security community. We continuously optimize Nessus based on community feedback to make it the most accurate and comprehensive vulnerability assessment solution in the market. 20 years later and we&#39;re still laser focused on community collaboration and product innovation to provide the most accurate and complete vulnerability data - so you don&#39;t miss critical issues which could put your organization at risk. Tenable is a 2021 Gartner Representative Vendor in Vulnerability Assessment.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Tenable Nessus is:
- Slower to reach roi
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast), [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/indusface-was-vs-tenable-nessus)
**Compare Tenable Nessus with other alternatives:**
- [Tenable Nessus vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Tenable Nessus vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-tenable-nessus)

  ### 4. [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews)
By Wiz
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 844
Wiz is a CNAPP that consolidates CSPM, KSPM, CWPP, vulnerability management, IaC scanning, CIEM, DSPM, and container and Kubernetes security into a single platform.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Wiz is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
- Easier to admin
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/indusface-was-vs-wiz-wiz)
**Compare Wiz with other alternatives:**
- [Wiz vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/tenable-nessus-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Wiz vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-wiz-wiz)

  ### 5. [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews)
By Red Hat
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 377
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a simple way to automate apps and infrastructure. Application Deployment + Configuration Management + Continuous Delivery.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is:
- Slower to reach roi
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/indusface-was-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
**Compare Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform with other alternatives:**
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)

  ### 6. [Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/products/orca-security/reviews)
By Orca Security
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 314
Get workload-level visibility into AWS, Azure, and GCP without the operational costs of agents. You could buy three tools instead… but why? Orca replaces legacy vulnerability assessment tools, CSPM, and CWPP. Deploys in minutes, not months.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Orca Security is:
- More expensive
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/indusface-was-vs-orca-security)
**Compare Orca Security with other alternatives:**
- [Orca Security vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-orca-security)
- [Orca Security vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-orca-security)
- [Orca Security vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Orca Security vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Orca Security vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/orca-security-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Orca Security vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-orca-security)
- [Orca Security vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-orca-security)
- [Orca Security vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-orca-security)
- [Orca Security vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-orca-security)

  ### 7. [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews)
By Harness
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 315
Harness is the first Continuous Delivery-as-a-Service platform that uses Machine Learning to simplify the entire process of delivering code from artifact into production – quickly, safely, securely, and repeatably.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Harness Platform is:
- Slower to reach roi
- More expensive
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast), [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-indusface-was)
**Compare Harness Platform with other alternatives:**
- [Harness Platform vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-harness-platform)
- [Harness Platform vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-harness-platform)
- [Harness Platform vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Harness Platform vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Harness Platform vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Harness Platform vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-orca-security)
- [Harness Platform vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-harness-platform)
- [Harness Platform vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-intruder)
- [Harness Platform vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-harness-platform)

  ### 8. [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews)
By Gearset
**Average Rating:** 4.7/5
**Total Reviews:** 305
Gearset is the most trusted DevOps platform with a full suite of powerful solutions for every team developing on Salesforce. Deploy: Achieve fast, reliable metadata and data deployments, including sandbox seeding, Vlocity, CPQ and Flows. Automate: Speed up your end-to-end release management with CI/CD and pipelines, for both regular releases and long term projects. Data management: Securely back up, archive, and restore your data with confidence.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Gearset DevOps is:
- Easier to admin
- More usable
- Easier to set up
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-indusface-was)
**Compare Gearset DevOps with other alternatives:**
- [Gearset DevOps vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-gearset-devops)
- [Gearset DevOps vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-gitlab)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-orca-security)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-harness-platform)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-intruder)
- [Gearset DevOps vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-gearset-devops)

  ### 9. [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews)
By Intruder
**Average Rating:** 4.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 209
Intruder is a proactive security monitoring platform for internet-facing systems.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Intruder is:
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast), [Penetration Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/penetration-testing-tools), [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/indusface-was-vs-intruder)
**Compare Intruder with other alternatives:**
- [Intruder vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/burp-suite-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/gitlab-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Intruder vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Intruder vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Intruder vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/intruder-vs-orca-security)
- [Intruder vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/harness-platform-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/gearset-devops-vs-intruder)
- [Intruder vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-intruder)

  ### 10. [Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/products/aikido-security/reviews)
By Aikido Security
**Average Rating:** 4.6/5
**Total Reviews:** 257
Aikido Security is a developer-first software security platform. We scan your source code &amp; cloud to show you which vulnerabilities are actually important to solve. Triaging is sped up by massively reducing false-positives and making CVEs human-readable. Aikido makes it simple to keep your product secure and gives you back time to do what youdo best: writing code.


Reviewers say compared to Indusface WAS, Aikido Security is:
- Easier to admin
- Easier to set up
- More usable
Categories in common with Indusface WAS: [Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)](https://www.g2.com/categories/dynamic-application-security-testing-dast), [Penetration Testing](https://www.g2.com/categories/penetration-testing-tools), [Vulnerability Scanner](https://www.g2.com/categories/vulnerability-scanner)

**Compare:** [Indusface WAS vs Aikido Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-indusface-was)
**Compare Aikido Security with other alternatives:**
- [Aikido Security vs Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-burp-suite)
- [Aikido Security vs GitLab](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-gitlab)
- [Aikido Security vs Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-tenable-nessus)
- [Aikido Security vs Wiz](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-wiz-wiz)
- [Aikido Security vs Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-red-hat-ansible-automation-platform)
- [Aikido Security vs Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-orca-security)
- [Aikido Security vs Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-harness-platform)
- [Aikido Security vs Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-gearset-devops)
- [Aikido Security vs Intruder](https://www.g2.com/compare/aikido-security-vs-intruder)


---
## Indusface WAS Alternatives FAQs

### How does Indusface WAS compare to GitLab?

According to G2 data, [Indusface WAS](https://www.g2.com/products/indusface-was/reviews) and [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) both have strong average ratings, with Indusface WAS at 4.6/5 from 67 reviews and GitLab at 4.5/5 from 893 reviews. Indusface WAS excels in security-focused features such as vulnerability detection, automated scanning, and penetration testing, with 19 mentions of vulnerability detection and 6 mentions of scanning efficiency. It scores higher in customer support (9.4 vs 8.5) and ease of doing business (9.4 vs 8.8) by 0.9 and 0.6 points respectively. It also leads in usability (9.0 vs 8.7) and ease of setup (9.0 vs 8.7) by 0.3 points each, reflecting a more user-friendly and quicker onboarding experience. GitLab, on the other hand, is praised for its comprehensive DevOps platform capabilities, including integrated CI/CD pipelines, version control, issue tracking, and collaboration tools, with 40 mentions of ease of use and 39 mentions of features. It scores slightly lower than Indusface WAS in support (8.5 vs 9.4) and ease of admin (8.6 vs 8.9) by 0.9 and 0.3 points respectively but offers a broader feature set for software development lifecycle management. In summary, Indusface WAS is favored for specialized security scanning and vulnerability management with superior support and usability scores, while GitLab is chosen for its all-in-one DevOps platform with extensive CI/CD and collaboration features, albeit with a more complex user experience.



### What are the best alternatives to Indusface WAS?

The best alternatives to Indusface WAS based on G2 user ratings and review counts include [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 893 reviews), [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 794 reviews), [Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/red-hat-ansible-automation-platform/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 377 reviews), [Tenable Nessus](https://www.g2.com/products/tenable-nessus/reviews) (4.5/5 stars, 301 reviews), [Gearset DevOps](https://www.g2.com/products/gearset-devops/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 292 reviews), [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 281 reviews), [Orca Security](https://www.g2.com/products/orca-security/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 268 reviews), [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) (4.8/5 stars, 129 reviews), [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) (4.8/5 stars, 206 reviews), and [vPenTest](https://www.g2.com/products/vpentest/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 234 reviews).



### What features do alternatives offer that Indusface WAS does not?

Alternatives to Indusface WAS offer features not available natively in Indusface WAS, including Compliance Testing (available in Wiz, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Tenable Nessus, Orca Security, Burp Suite, and Intruder), Static Code Analysis (offered by Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Tenable Nessus, Orca Security, and Burp Suite), API / Integrations (present in Burp Suite and Intruder), Command-Line Tools and Penetration Testing (Burp Suite), and Extensibility (Burp Suite and Intruder).



### Which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools do reviewers recommend instead of Indusface WAS?

Reviewers recommend several Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) tools instead of Indusface WAS, notably [Burp Suite](https://www.g2.com/products/burp-suite/reviews) with a 4.8-star rating across 129 reviews praised for its comprehensive web application security testing capabilities and extensibility; [Intruder](https://www.g2.com/products/intruder/reviews) (4.8/5 stars, 206 reviews) valued for its ease of use, clear prioritization, and continuous scanning; and [vPenTest](https://www.g2.com/products/vpentest/reviews) (4.6/5 stars, 234 reviews) noted for automating penetration testing with clear, actionable reporting. Additionally, [Wiz](https://www.g2.com/products/wiz-wiz/reviews) (4.7/5 stars, 794 reviews) is recommended for its agentless, comprehensive cloud-native application protection platform with strong risk prioritization and ease of setup. These tools are favored for their advanced features, usability, and strong customer support, making them preferred choices for DAST needs beyond Indusface WAS.



### Why do users choose GitLab over Indusface WAS?

Users choose [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews) over Indusface WAS primarily for its comprehensive all-in-one DevOps platform capabilities. With 40 mentions of ease of use and 39 mentions of features, GitLab integrates source code management, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, and collaboration tools into a single platform, streamlining the entire software development lifecycle. Its built-in CI/CD pipelines are highlighted in 33 reviews as powerful and easy to configure, enabling automation from code to deployment without requiring third-party tools. GitLab&#39;s strong integration capabilities (32 mentions) and collaboration features (31 mentions) facilitate smoother teamwork and project management. Users appreciate the merge request workflows, inline code reviews, and visibility into pipelines, which enhance code quality and team coordination. The platform&#39;s flexibility to self-host or use SaaS options also appeals to organizations seeking control over their infrastructure. Users value GitLab&#39;s ability to consolidate multiple tools into one, reducing context switching and improving development efficiency. This unified experience, combined with extensive automation and project management features, drives users to prefer GitLab for end-to-end DevOps needs over specialized security tools like Indusface WAS.




## Explore Articles
- [What desktop publishing software cuts the time it takes to create digital marketing materials from hours down to something a team can actually manage daily?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-desktop-publishing-software-cuts-the-time-it-takes-to-create-digital-marketing-materials-from-hours-down-to-something-a-team-can-actually-manage-daily)
- [Which publisher ad servers have the best header bidding support for a publisher that wants to maximize competition for each impression without a complex technical setup?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-publisher-ad-servers-have-the-best-header-bidding-support-for-a-publisher-that-wants-to-maximize-competition-for-each-impression-without-a-complex-technical-setup)
- [Leading spend management services for startups](https://www.g2.com/discussions/leading-spend-management-services-for-startups-which-tools-help-you-move-fast-without-losing-control)
- [Which contractor payment platforms give accountants a clear, auditable trail for international payments without exporting to a separate system to reconcile?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-contractor-payment-platforms-give-accountants-a-clear-auditable-trail-for-international-payments-without-exporting-to-a-separate-system-to-reconcile)
- [Top platforms for managing CI pipelines at scale](https://www.g2.com/discussions/top-platforms-for-managing-ci-pipelines-at-scale)
- [Best cpq software for small businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-s-the-best-cpq-software-for-small-businesses)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Expense Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/expense-management)
- [CPQ Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cpq)
- [AI Sales Assistant Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/ai-sales-assistant)

