Gitlab is used extensively as the central hub of our team based workflow that handles repositories, branches, pull requests, and code reviews. Feature branches are used to control the scope of development work, and pull requests are used for reviewing, communicating, and ultimately merging changes. With Gitlab Actions, we automate testing and deployment tasks, and issues are used as a common repository of development and bug tracking. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The interface can feel a bit cluttered when we have lots of repos, branches, pull requests, and notifications going on simultaneously. Creating more complex GitLab Actions workflows may require a bit of technical experience for advanced CI/CD workflows. Some admin and security features require upgrading to higher-tier plans and can be costly as our team grows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love that I can have repositories, merge requests, pipelines, runners and deployment workflows all in the same tool. Our team uses Gitlab as the place to look at what changed, what the state of a pipeline is and what is causing deployment to be stuck. It is also straightforward to view where development is versus how that relates to operations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It offers many configuration options to consider, so it can be a while before the setup of runners, permissions, branch rules, and pipelines is all figured out. It can also look cluttered when working on larger projects, with dozens of repositories and pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The recent introduction of GitLab Duo AI Agents and terminal integration has made managing workflows significantly easier, as AI assistance directly accelerates code reviews, branch management, and CI/CD troubleshooting. Furthermore, having a built-in Secrets Manager natively integrated into CI/CD pipelines eliminates the complexity of using external vaults while keeping environment variables and deployment tokens secure. Combined with improved secret scanning that detects complex passwords across full commit histories, it provides a much smoother, more secure, and unified development experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While GitLab provides a comprehensive DevOps platform, navigating its vast feature set across complex nested projects and CI/CD configurations can occasionally feel cluttered. Additionally, managing heavy pipeline runner overhead or debugging intricate continuous integration configurations locally prior to pushing changes can still present a steep learning curve for development teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab is most helpful because it brings source code, issue tracking, merge requests, and CI/CD into one place. I like that the workflow is fairly organized, so it’s easy to track changes and see what needs attention without switching between several tools. The integrations are useful when connecting GitLab with other development tools, and the CI/CD features are a strong advantage for automating builds and deployments. The interface is generally clear, although some advanced settings can take time to get familiar with. Overall, it offers good value for teams that actually use its broader DevSecOps capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside is that GitLab can feel a little overwhelming when you first start using it, especially with the number of settings and DevOps features available. Some parts of the UI could be more intuitive, and finding specific configuration options can take a bit of time. The platform is powerful, but smaller teams may not use enough of the features to fully justify the cost of higher-tier plans. The integrations are useful, although setting up some of them can require extra configuration. AI features are helpful in certain workflows, but I wouldn’t consider them the main reason to choose GitLab. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about GitLab is how it brings the entire DevOps workflow into one platform. From source code management and branching to CI/CD pipelines and issue tracking, everything is centralized, which makes collaboration much easier. I especially find the built-in CI/CD pipelines very useful because they automate testing and deployments directly from the repository, reducing manual effort and speeding up delivery. The merge request workflow also helps with better code review and team collaboration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about GitLab is that it can feel a bit complex at times, especially when setting up CI/CD pipelines or managing advanced configurations. The flexibility is great, but it also means there’s a learning curve before everything works smoothly. I also find that the interface can feel slightly heavy or cluttered when working across multiple projects, which sometimes slows down navigation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The best thing I like about GitLab is that it provides an all-in-one DevOps platform where I can manage code, CI/CD pipelines, issue changes, code reviews, and security scanning. GitLab also helps me push code from my local environment to staging and production. It supports different stages, such as build, our company environment stage, and production, and it improves security by scanning the code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don’t have any major dislikes about GitLab; it’s a good product overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Gitlab has got a user friendly interface which makes our tasks easier, they provide instructions to work with our code easing the task of pushing and pulling into repos, further they offer wide range of APIs which help us in the integration with various softwares for example recently I have developed a fastApi application to integrate gitlab with basecamp and these APIs got very beneficial Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There’s only one thing that really needs to be fixed: each individual project has its own webhooks option. I think it would be better if there were a parent project, under which all the sub-projects could sit, so that webhooks could be managed in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about GitLab is that it brings source control, code reviews, CI/CD, and issue tracking into a single platform. The interface is clean, pipelines are easy to monitor, and having everything in one place makes collaboration and tracking development progress much more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area for improvement would be the performance of larger projects, where some pages and pipelines can occasionally feel slower than expected. It would also be helpful if certain advanced CI/CD configurations were a bit more intuitive for new users, with clearer guidance and easier navigation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The new AI features, especially the autocomplete for VSCode really blend well with other AI tools and really speed up the development. The UI is neat, I love the ability to check the reviewed file and the fact that it will uncheck when a change is pushed. We've built custom integration for Gitlab, the API and the documentation really make this platform a powerful, customizable tool to achieve all of our complex needs. For the price, it is hard to go elsewhere. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the UI is buggy and the data is not refreshed correctly, I have to manually refresh the page. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GitLab is an all-in-one DevOps platform that truly stands out. Having version control, CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking, container registry, and security scanning all under one roof eliminates the need to integrate multiple third-party tools. The built-in CI/CD system is incredibly powerful and flexible — writing pipelines with .gitlab-ci.yml is straightforward once you get the hang of it. The merge request workflow with inline code review, threaded discussions, and approval rules makes collaboration between developers smooth and traceable. Self-hosted and SaaS options give great flexibility depending on your infrastructure needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The sheer number of features can be overwhelming, especially for new users or small teams that only need basic version control. The interface, while comprehensive, can feel slow and cluttered at times. The free tier has become more limited over the years, pushing teams toward paid plans sooner than expected. Also, the CI/CD runner configuration can be tricky to set up correctly in self-hosted environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.