CoderPad Reviews & Product Details

Talent acquisition & engineering teams use CoderPad to hire developers with confidence. CoderPad Screen is our best-in-class technical screening tool to help teams filter candidates based on their coding skills in a fast, unbiased, and anything-but-boring way. Have confidence you’re sending your engineering team only the best candidates for collaborative coding interviews. CoderPad Interview is our collaborative coding interview tool designed to help you get the best read possible on your candidates. Jump into an intuitive IDE and code with your candidates to see how they would work with your team on real-world projects. Over 4,000 companies, including 22 of the Fortune 100, leverage CoderPad to conduct 100,000+ live interviews and 80,000+ technical screens per month.

Product Website

Seller

CoderPad

Discussions

CoderPad Community

Languages Supported

English, French

Overview by

Arpan Jhaveri

Pricing

Pricing provided by CoderPad.

Free

2 Interviews Per Month

View More Pricing Information

CoderPad Integrations

(5)

Verified by CoderPad

CoderPad Media

Official Downloads

(3)

edit

How BigCommerce Stayed a Step Ahead of Remote Hiring

Netskope Improves Their Developer Interview Experience

G2 reviews are authentic and verified.

Here's how.

Sanket P.

Software engineering

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

1/16/2026

"Simple, Distraction-Free Live Coding Interviews with Smooth Real-Time Collaboration"

5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

What I like most about CoderPad is how simple and focused it is for technical interviews. It doesn't try to do too many things, and that makes it easy to use during live coding sessions. The real-time collaboration works very smoothly. Both interviewers and candidates can write code together without lag, which makes the interview feel more natural. I really like that it supports multiple languages, so I can interview candidates with different tech stacks without switching tools. Another good thing is that it feels close to a real coding environment. Candidates can think clearly instead of fighting with a complicated editor. It is very useful that no setup is required for candidates. They can just open the link and start coding, which reduces stress. The interface is clean and distraction-free, which helps both sides focus on problem-solving. I also like that interviewers can run code during the session, which helps validate logic instantly. it workd well even with remote interviews, which is very important for distributed teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

One thing I dislike is that the UI is very basic, and some users may expect more advanced editor features. The platform is mostly focused on interviews, so it is not suitable for practice or long-term coding sessions. Sometimes, debugging tools are limited, which makes deep debugging harder. Pricing can feel a bit expensive for small teams that do only a few interviews per month. It would be nice to have more customization options for interview templates. Analytics and reporting after the interview are quite minimal. There is limited support for folkline or science docing challenges. Some advanced language-specific features are missing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

Coderpad solves the problem of conducting fair and effective technical interviews remotely. Without it, interviews turn into screen-sharing problems instead of real coding. It benefits interviews by allowing them to see how the candidate thinks, not just the final answer. It helps reduce interview stress for the candidate because the environment is simple and familiar. For the hiring team, it improves consistency in interviews since everyone uses the same setup. It saves time by removing setup and tool issues during interviews. It supports better technical evaluation because real coding happens in real time. It helps teams hire stronger developers because they are based on actual problem-solving skills. It also improves the overall candidate experience, which reflects well on the company. It helps the interviewer focus on the thinking process, not just the final solution, which gives a more accurate view of the candidate's skill. It reduces bias in interviews because everyone is evaluated in the same environment with the same tools. It makes interviews more conversational. Since both sides can talk, code, and explore ideas together instead of following a strict test format. It helps teams identify real-world skills, like problem breakdown, edge case thinking, and communication, not just memorized answers. It supports pair programming style interviews, which better reflect how developers actually work on the job. It helps companies build trust with candidates because the interview feels fair, transparent, and respectful of their time. It allows interviewers to ask follow-up questions naturally because they can modify the problem on the spot and see how the candidate reacts. It helps candidates explain their thinking while coding, which shows communication skills that are hard to judge in written tests. It removes pressure from perfect syntax, letting candidates focus more on logic and approach, which feels closer to real work. It gives interviewers a chance to coach lightly during the session, which shows how well a candidate takes feedback and adapts. It makes the interviews feel less like an exam and more like teamwork, which leaves a positive impression even if the candidate is not selected. It helps interviewers adjust difficulties in real time, depending on how the candidate is performing, which leads to fairer evaluation. It supports multiple interviews joining the same session, making panel interviews smoother and more organized. It reduces technical distraction, so both sides can focus fully on problem-solving instead of tool issues. It helps teams standardize their interview process, which is useful when hiring at scale. It gives candidates a clear and professional interview experience, which reflects positively on the company and its engineering culture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Radhika R.

Full Stack developer

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

1/16/2026

"Easy, Setup-Free Coding with Smooth Real-Time Collaboration"

4.5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

What i like most about CoderPad is how easy and straightforward it is to use. There is no unnecessary setup, so you can jump straight into coding without getting distracted. The real time collaboration also feels very smooth, which makes the whole experience feel more like a normal coding discussion than a formal interview. I also like that it supports multiple languages and gives you the freedom to think, try things out, and fix mistakes as you go. Overall, it creates a relaxed environment that feels closer to real world coding rather than a high pressure test. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

One drawback of CoderPad is that performance can occasionally depend on browser stability or internet connection, which can interrupt the flow during longer sessions. For candidates who rely heavily on specific tooling or workflows, this can feel a bit restrictive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

CoderPad Solves the problem of technical evaluations feeling too rigid and unrealistic. Instead of awkward tests or heavy setup, it lets you code in a simple, shared environment that feels closer to real work. For me, that means less stress and fewer distractions. Screening feels fair, interviews turn into actual coding conversations, and the overall process is quicker and clearer. It helps me focus in how i think and solve problems, not on fighting the tool Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nitesh V.

QA Engineer

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

10/18/2025

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"Excellent for Interactive Interviews, But Editor Lag and Learning Curve Present"

4/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

This platform streamlines technical interviews, making them both smooth and interactive thanks to real-time coding capabilities. It offers support for a wide range of programming languages and frameworks, which adds to its versatility. The collaborative environment closely resembles a real coding setup, enhancing the overall experience. Additionally, it enables a precise evaluation of a candidate’s problem-solving abilities and coding skills. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

The editor sometimes experiences lag when working with larger or more complex code. Its debugging features are not as extensive as those found in a full IDE. Additionally, support for certain languages or libraries can be incomplete. New users might also find the interface a bit unintuitive initially. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

This tool enables real-time coding assessments during interviews, offering a more dynamic alternative to traditional static coding tests. It provides a more accurate way to evaluate a candidate’s problem-solving abilities and coding skills. The collaborative features allow interviewers to offer guidance and observe the candidate’s thought process as they work. Overall, this enhances the quality of hiring and makes the technical interview process more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jorge Luis R.

Cloud Engineer

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

2/5/2026

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"Easy, Reliable Platform for Real-Time Technical Interviews"

5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

is easy to use, reliable, and well suited for real time technical interviews. It supports multiple languages, has a clean interface, and allows candidates to focus on problem solving rather than setup or tooling issues Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

Some advanced features are limited compared to a full IDE, and debugging tools could be more robust. Occasionally. Setup options for complex environments feel restrictive during advanced interviews Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Joel S.

Analista de Datos y Auxiliar de Sistemas de Información

Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)

12/8/2025

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"Functional, but it needs to improve the learning curve."

4/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

"The real-time execution of code: It is the most valuable feature. It allows for the authentic assessment of candidates' practical skills, unlike the old whiteboards or text editors without execution." Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

The learning curve for new interviewers: At first, the interface can overwhelm interviewers who are not accustomed to live execution or debugging features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

Ease of use Eliminates the need to share screens and set up local environments. Saves time and provides a smoother experience for both.

Ease of implementation Allows standardizing coding challenges for different roles. Ensures that the evaluation is fair and consistent throughout the organization.

Number of features Allows seeing the candidate's debugging ability and thought process (not just the final result). Improves the quality of hires by providing deeper insight. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Investment Banking

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

10/28/2025

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"Efficient, Realistic Coding Interviews with Minor Performance Hiccups"

4.5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

Coderpad provides a smooth and intuitive environment for live technical interviews... i particularly appreciate how easy it is to run code in multiple programming languages without any setup, which makes interviews efficient and realistic. the collaborative editor built-in execution, and real-time feedback features make it ideal for assessing problem solving and communication skills during interviews Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

Sometimes the execution environment can lag slightly for larger codebases or more complex scripts... it would also be great to have more customization options for the interface and better support for advanced libraries or frameworks in some languages. Despite this it remains one of the most reliable platforms for coding interviews Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

CoderPad solves the challenge of conducting effective and fair technical interviews remotely. It allows real-time collaboration between interviewer and candidate, enabling both parties to write, execute, and debug code interactively without the need for any installation or setup. This saves a lot of time, ensures consistency in evaluations, and provides a realistic view of a candidate’s coding and problem-solving skills. It also helps standardize the interview process across teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Skander C.

Étudiant en mastére

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

10/28/2025

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"An efficient and intuitive platform for technical interviews"

5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

CoderPad offers an excellent real-time collaborative coding experience. The interface is intuitive and allows for easy testing of code in multiple languages. The screen sharing feature greatly facilitates technical interviews and teamwork. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

Overall, the experience is very positive. A few additional auto-completion features could further enhance the user experience, but it remains an excellent tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

CoderPad provides solutions to several major problems encountered during technical recruitment and code collaboration. It removes the obstacles of remote technical interviews through a shared real-time coding environment. There is no longer a need to send files by email or juggle between different tools.

For me, this allows for the effective evaluation of candidates' technical skills in a realistic setting. Live code execution offers the possibility to instantly verify proposed solutions, which represents a significant time saver. Being able to collaborate on code as if we were in the same room greatly improves the quality of technical interviews and makes the experience more interactive and engaging for all participants. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

vanaja g.

11/25/2025

"Beginner-Friendly with a Straightforward Interface"

4/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

I used CoderPad to take an exam and found it to be easy to understand, which is particularly beneficial for beginners. The platform's clean and simple interface contributed to a user-friendly experience. I appreciated that the assessments were well timeboxed, allowing for efficient time management during exams. I like how straightforward CoderPad is, as it provided a good overall test experience without any major issues. The initial setup was easy, which made it convenient to start using right away. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

I find that the user interface of CoderPad could be more polished. While it functions adequately for my needs, the overall design feels like it could benefit from refinement to enhance user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Verified User in Computer Software

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

1/10/2026

Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.

"A Solid Choice That Meets Expectations"

4/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

What I like best about CoderPad is how it focuses on real-world problem solving instead of trick questions. It creates a collaborative environment where candidates can think out loud, write production-style code, and discuss trade-offs—very similar to how engineers actually work day to day. It also removes unnecessary stress by providing familiar tools and environments, which leads to fairer and more meaningful interviews. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

One thing I dislike about CoderPad is that time constraints can sometimes limit deeper exploration of edge cases, testing, or refactoring, even when the problem is interesting. In real projects, those steps are important, but in an interview setting there isn’t always enough time to fully demonstrate them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Ganesh G.

Senior Software Engineer

Information Technology and Services

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

7/25/2025

"Best interviewing tool"

4.5/5

What do you like best about CoderPad?

I took over 40 interview in span of 12 month and my experience was really great. It allowed me to build a question bank and then switch between different question for each candidate. Switching question in CoderPad automatically switch the programming language environment. The report and playback summary is top notch. It allowed us to look deep inside the entire duration of interview. It shows what key candidate has pressed, how many times she switched tab, copy & paste. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about CoderPad?

Too costly. Also if they can provide more pad in free tier - that would be great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is CoderPad solving and how is that benefiting you?

Setting up environment for taking coding interview is always challenging. CoderPad really made this easy. Questions bank feature is most lucrative one, allowing to choose between different sets of questions for each candidate really cut the time. Each question came with it pre-defined set of environment, switching question automatically enabled the programming language and corresponding tools. This way you came solely focus on taking interviewing rather fighting with tool itself. Reporting allows to see the playback of entire session with anti-cheat metrics, which is really great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.