Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Informatica Dynamic Data Masking and Tonic.ai 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kpow for Apache Kafka®
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kitecyber
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking
Star Rating
(22)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Informatica Dynamic Data MaskingTonic.ai
Star Rating
(37)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (43.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tonic.aiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Informatica Dynamic Data Masking excels in dynamic masking capabilities, with a score of 8.8, while Tonic.ai falls behind at 7.6. Reviewers mention that this feature is crucial for real-time data protection in enterprise environments.
- Reviewers mention that Tonic.ai shines in static pseudonymization, scoring 8.8 compared to Informatica's 7.9. Users say this feature is particularly beneficial for organizations needing to anonymize data for compliance without losing data utility.
- G2 users highlight that Informatica's quality of support is rated at 8.4, which is lower than Tonic.ai's impressive 9.2. Users report that Tonic.ai's support team is responsive and helpful, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Users on G2 indicate that Tonic.ai is more compliant with GDPR and CCPA regulations, scoring 9.3 in both areas, while Informatica scores 8.3 and 8.6 respectively. Reviewers mention that this compliance is a significant factor for businesses operating in regulated industries.
- Reviewers mention that Informatica's batch de-identification feature is rated highly at 9.0, which is a strong point for users needing to process large datasets efficiently. In contrast, Tonic.ai's score of 7.9 indicates room for improvement in this area.
- Users say that while both products offer solid data transport security, Informatica's multi-factor authentication feature scores 8.5, significantly outperforming Tonic.ai's 5.0. Reviewers emphasize the importance of robust security measures in protecting sensitive data.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking
No pricing availableTonic.ai
No pricing availableFree Trial
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking
No trial information availableTonic.ai
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
18
9.1
20
Ease of Use
8.6
18
8.0
21
Ease of Setup
8.2
10
7.9
13
Ease of Admin
8.2
10
8.3
10
Quality of Support
8.4
18
9.2
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.0
9
8.7
10
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
18
8.8
20
Features by Category
Data Masking
8.5
12
8.7
9
8.8
12
Feature Not Available
8.2
12
8.7
9
8.6
12
8.3
9
8.5
11
7.8
9
Compliance
8.3
8
9.3
7
8.6
6
9.3
7
Functionality
7.9
8
8.8
7
8.3
8
9.2
6
9.0
7
7.9
7
Connectivity
8.3
6
4.7
6
8.9
6
7.4
7
Data Type
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
6.9
6
Not enough data
6.9
6
Synthesis Type
Not enough data
7.1
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Data Transformation
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking and Tonic.ai are categorized as Data De-Identification and Data Masking
Unique Categories
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking has no unique categories
Tonic.ai is categorized as Synthetic Data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tonic.ai
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
25.0%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Computer & Network Security
10.0%
Supermarkets
5.0%
Other
40.0%
Computer Software
32.4%
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Financial Services
13.5%
Education Management
8.1%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Other
27.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Informatica Dynamic Data Masking has no discussions with answers
Tonic.ai has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
