Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CodeScan and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact for Pricing
No pricing available
CodeScan
Star Rating
(34)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact for Pricing
Browse all 3 pricing plansOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer excels in its Static Code Analysis capabilities, scoring 8.7, while CodeScan outperforms with a score of 9.2, indicating a more robust analysis feature that users find beneficial for identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process.
- Users report that the Quality of Support for CodeScan is notably higher, with a score of 9.0 compared to OpenText's 8.6, suggesting that CodeScan provides more responsive and effective customer service, which is crucial for teams needing quick resolutions to issues.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText Fortify's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.1, while CodeScan shines with a score of 8.7, indicating that users find CodeScan easier to implement, which can significantly reduce onboarding time for new teams.
- Users on G2 mention that CodeScan's Test Automation feature, although rated lower at 7.3, is still preferred over OpenText's 8.5, as it integrates well with existing CI/CD pipelines, making it a more flexible option for automated testing workflows.
- Reviewers say that OpenText Fortify's False Positives rate is a concern, scoring 6.5, which can lead to unnecessary workload for developers, whereas CodeScan's lower score of 5.8 indicates a more accurate detection system, reducing the time spent on false alarms.
- Users report that both products have similar Detection Rates at 8.3, but CodeScan's additional features for Compliance Testing (8.8) provide an edge, as users find it more effective in ensuring adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CodeScan
Cloud
Contact for Pricing
Use CodeScan technology for any
Salesforce instance. Get all the benefits of our Self Hosted service without the need of servers or internal infrastructure. Leverage the CodeScan Cloud and avoid installing, running and maintaining it on your own infrastructure.
- APEX, Visualforce, Lightning, Metadata
- 500+ Rules
- CD/CI Pipeline Integration
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
CodeScan
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
16
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.6
18
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.7
10
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.8
12
8.1
9
Quality of Support
9.0
20
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
12
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
21
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
8.8
8
8.9
9
8.3
8
8.7
10
Analysis
8.5
8
8.3
11
7.9
8
8.0
11
9.2
8
8.8
11
9.2
8
8.5
10
Testing
Not enough data
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
7.3
5
8.7
10
8.8
7
8.5
8
8.3
5
7.0
9
8.3
6
8.3
9
5.8
6
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CodeScan and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Code Analysis and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
CodeScan has no unique categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CodeScan
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Hospital & Health Care
10.0%
Management Consulting
6.7%
Insurance
6.7%
Other
43.3%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Discussions
CodeScan has no discussions with answers
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
