Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS CodeCommit and Mercurial 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS CodeCommit
Star Rating
(84)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (51.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS CodeCommitMercurial
Star Rating
(31)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MercurialSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mercurial excels in its ease of setup, with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a straightforward version control system. In contrast, AWS CodeCommit has a lower setup ease score of 8.3, which some users find less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that AWS CodeCommit offers superior quality of support, scoring 8.6 compared to Mercurial's 7.6. Users appreciate the responsive customer service and comprehensive documentation provided by AWS, which enhances their overall experience.
- G2 users highlight that Mercurial has a strong performance in meeting requirements with a score of 8.6, while AWS CodeCommit slightly edges ahead with a score of 8.9. This indicates that both products are effective, but AWS CodeCommit may better align with specific user needs.
- Users on G2 report that Mercurial shines in its user-friendly interface, reflected in its ease of use score of 8.8. In comparison, AWS CodeCommit's score of 8.6 suggests it may have a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that the product direction for AWS CodeCommit is highly rated at 9.6, indicating a strong positive outlook for future updates and features. In contrast, Mercurial's product direction score of 6.8 raises concerns about its long-term viability and innovation.
- Users say that while both products cater to small businesses, Mercurial has a slightly larger market segment representation at 54.8% compared to AWS CodeCommit's 50.6%. This suggests a broader acceptance and trust in Mercurial among small business users.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS CodeCommit
No pricing availableMercurial
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS CodeCommit
No trial information availableMercurial
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
52
8.6
30
Ease of Use
8.6
52
8.8
30
Ease of Setup
8.3
18
9.1
9
Ease of Admin
8.2
17
8.3
9
Quality of Support
8.6
48
7.6
16
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
8.1
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.6
52
6.8
29
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS CodeCommit and Mercurial are categorized as Version Control Software
Unique Categories
AWS CodeCommit has no unique categories
Mercurial has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS CodeCommit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Mercurial
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
35.5%
Information Technology and Services
14.5%
Financial Services
6.6%
Marketing and Advertising
5.3%
Hospital & Health Care
3.9%
Other
34.2%
Information Technology and Services
25.8%
Computer Software
25.8%
Internet
16.1%
Telecommunications
6.5%
Research
3.2%
Other
22.6%
Discussions
What is AWS CodeCommit used for?
1 Comment
KC
AWS CodeCommit is a Git-like repository for storing and versioning your source code.Read more
AWS CodeCommit has no more discussions with answers
Mercurial has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
