Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Apache JMeter and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Star Rating
(156)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache JMeter
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Apache JMeter excels in stress testing with a score of 9.1, while OpenText LoadRunner Professional scores lower at 8.3. Reviewers mention that JMeter's ability to handle high loads effectively makes it a preferred choice for performance testing.
  • Reviewers say that JMeter offers superior customization options, scoring 9.2 compared to LoadRunner's lower score. Users on G2 highlight JMeter's flexibility in creating tailored test scenarios as a significant advantage.
  • G2 users note that OpenText LoadRunner Professional shines in test variety, achieving a score of 9.3, while JMeter scores 8.5. Reviewers mention that LoadRunner's extensive protocol support allows for a broader range of testing scenarios.
  • Users say that JMeter has a more straightforward setup process, scoring 8.6, compared to LoadRunner's 6.7. Reviewers mention that JMeter's open-source nature contributes to easier installation and configuration.
  • Reviewers mention that LoadRunner's reporting capabilities are superior, with a score of 9.0, while JMeter scores 8.2. Users report that LoadRunner's detailed analytics and visualization tools provide deeper insights into performance metrics.
  • Users on G2 highlight that JMeter has a strong community support system, reflected in its quality of support score of 7.5, while LoadRunner's score is slightly higher at 7.6. Reviewers mention that JMeter's community-driven resources often lead to quicker problem resolution.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache JMeter
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing available
Free Trial
Apache JMeter
No trial information available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
107
9.1
23
Ease of Use
7.8
107
8.3
24
Ease of Setup
8.6
32
6.7
9
Ease of Admin
8.5
31
7.4
9
Quality of Support
7.5
91
7.6
24
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
29
7.8
9
Product Direction (% positive)
7.8
102
8.5
23
Features by Category
8.6
66
8.5
11
Functionality
9.1
59
8.3
7
8.4
52
7.4
7
8.5
58
9.3
7
Reporting
8.2
58
9.0
7
8.4
10
Not enough data
Functionality
8.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Automation
8.0
10
Not enough data
9.0
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Apache JMeter and OpenText Professional Performance Engineering are categorized as Software Testing, Automation Testing, and Load Testing Tools
Unique Categories
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter has no unique categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
20.8%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
39.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
39.6%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
5.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
17.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
76.5%
Reviewers' Industry
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Information Technology and Services
36.7%
Computer Software
25.3%
Telecommunications
4.7%
Retail
2.0%
Program Development
2.0%
Other
29.3%
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Alternatives
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Alternatives
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
Tricentis Neoload
Tricentis Neoload
Add Tricentis Neoload
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Add BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Ranorex Studio
Ranorex Studio
Add Ranorex Studio
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering Alternatives
Tricentis Neoload
Tricentis Neoload
Add Tricentis Neoload
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
Add BlazeMeter Continuous Testing Platform
SOAPUI
SOAPUI
Add SOAPUI
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
Discussions
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Apache JMeter has no discussions with answers
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers