Marketing Software Resources
Articles and Discussions to expand your knowledge on Marketing Software
Resource pages are designed to give you a cross-section of information we have on specific categories. You'll find articles from our experts and discussions from users like you.
Marketing Software Articles
70+ Marketing Statistics to Shape Your Marketing Strategy in 2024
2023 Trends: Making Your Marketing Win in Times of Loss
Marketing Software Discussions
What's the best SMS marketing platform for consistently driving high engagement and conversion rates across campaigns? Not just open rates. Actual revenue. That distinction matters more than most platform comparisons let on.
From reviews in the SMS marketing software category:
- Attentive: Reviewers describe the AI tools setting the tone and timing for key sales windows, then running on their own. One reviewer said it freed up time for other work while still capturing strong engagement.
- Klaviyo: Reviewers credit the segmentation depth for making campaigns feel targeted rather than broadcast. The RFM and funnel analytics help teams figure out what's actually working and cut what isn't.
- Textedly: Gets called out for simplicity that doesn't sacrifice results. Reviewers describe getting campaigns live quickly without needing to build complex flows to achieve decent conversion rates.
- Omnisend: E-commerce reviewers mention cross-channel automation as what lifts conversion numbers. SMS and email working together in the same flow tend to perform better than either channel alone.
What's moved the needle most for your SMS campaigns? Better timing, tighter segmentation, or just being more selective about what you send?
I've stopped reporting on open rates internally because they're inflated enough to be basically meaningless. The revenue attribution piece is the only number that actually tells you whether the channel is working.
I'm putting together a roundup on SMS marketing platforms, and one thing keeps coming up in the research: deliverability and compliance are where most platforms quietly fail you at scale. Everything looks fine until you're sending millions of messages and your opt-out rates spike or you hit a carrier issue you didn't see coming.
Exploring options in the SMS marketing software category, these platforms kept coming up for this specific concern:
- Attentive: Enterprise reviewers specifically credit the customer success team for staying ahead of things like iOS privacy updates and carrier deliverability changes. One reviewer mentioned they were getting guidance on RCS Business Messaging before most brands had even started thinking about it.
- Insider One: Tops the enterprise grid. Reviewers point to the cross-channel orchestration and the audience segmentation tools as what keeps messages relevant rather than flagged, which matters a lot for sustained deliverability.
- Birdeye: Earns high marks in enterprise contexts for review management and local compliance handling. Reviewers describe it as reliable for regulated industries where every message needs to be traceable.
- Omnisend: Comes up for ecommerce brands that want compliance and segmentation handled together. Reviewers highlight the list hygiene automation and the built-in TCPA tools that run without manual setup.
- Klaviyo: Strong for brands that want to tie deliverability to actual audience behavior. Reviewers describe the segmentation as detailed enough to suppress unengaged contacts before they cause problems, not after.
For teams running at scale, how are you handling compliance? Is TCPA the main concern, or are carrier-level deliverability issues a bigger headache?
The RCS Business Messaging mention from Attentive reviewers is the most interesting thing in this post to me. Most brands haven't started thinking about it yet and a platform that's already guiding customers toward it feels like a meaningful difference from one that's just keeping up.
This comparison gets misunderstood more than most. HubSpot Marketing Hub vs Google Analytics for mid-market B2B teams proving pipeline ROI really comes down to what layer of the question you're trying to answer, and the honest answer is that these tools aren't solving the same problem.
From the Marketing Analytics Software category:
- HubSpot Marketing Hub: The right tool when the question is about revenue, pipeline, and deal attribution. Reviewers at B2B companies describe it as the platform that finally connected marketing activity to sales outcomes in a way they could show leadership, because the data lives in the same system as the CRM.
- Google Analytics: The right tool when the question is about traffic, behavior, and session-level data. Reviewers use it to understand how prospects move through the site before they become leads, which is a different question than what HubSpot answers. The gap is that GA stops at the conversion event and doesn't follow the contact through the sales process.
- Looker: Worth including here for teams that need to bridge both layers. Reviewers at mid-market B2B companies describe building dashboards that pull GA traffic data and HubSpot pipeline data into a unified view, which is the only way to answer both the marketing performance question and the revenue impact question at the same time.
The real decision isn't tool versus tool. It's about which question the team is most accountable for answering. If the ask is marketing performance, GA is the starting point. If the ask is pipeline ROI, HubSpot is. If it's both, you likely need both, or a layer like Looker on top.
Which question does your leadership actually hold marketing accountable for, and has the tool you're using made it easier or harder to answer it?
I've always thought of these two as solving different questions and the post is right that trying to use GA for pipeline ROI is asking it to do something it wasn't built for.