Rainforest QA Pricing

Name	Price	Features
Free Trial	FreeTrial and unlimited users	Hop into our platform and get started writing and running code free tests on mobile, desktop and web applications across our community-based and UI based automation!
Pay As You Go Monthly ( No Contract)	$50/ Hour - Manual Testing and $5/Hour -Automated TestingUnlimited users, Test Case Management, Reporting, and Integrations	The world's best QA team. On-demand, 24/7. Manual Regression Testing UI Based Automated Regression Testing Exploratory/Unscripted Testing Virtual Credit Card Payment Processing Native App Mobile Testing Full Suite Results in About 30 Minutes CI and Workflow Integration Test Writing Service Show More
Enterprise (Annual Contract)	Volume Discounting Starts at $40,000 Unlimited users, Test Case Management, Reporting, and Integrations	Enterprise-level thought partnership and the world's best QA team. On-demand, 24/7. Dedicated Customer Success Manager and Volume Discounting Custom Virtual Machines and Integrations Exploratory Testing Virtual Credit Card Payment Processing Native App Mobile Testing Full Suite Results in About 30 Minutes CI and Workflow Integration Test Writing Service Show More

Rainforest QA pricing & plans

Free Trial is available

Pricing information for Rainforest QA is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Rainforest QA must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing information was last updated on December 02, 2020

Rainforest QA Pricing-Related Review

AB

Alex B

Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Review source: Organic

Apr 18, 2017

"Automated testing, but with the benefit of humans!"

What do you like best?

Rainforest QA can best be thought of as a UI-driven functional system test automation service. The fact that real humans are executing the test scripts is a benefit in that it allows for easy detection of unanticipated errors or display issues. Because test runs are an "embarrassingly parallel" problem, a full test run takes no more than the duration of the longest manual run in a set, which itself may not take significantly longer than a custom-built Selenium run. Creating and maintaining test scripts is however vastly easier and creating them during development as part of a BDD cycle is feasible. Cross-browser testing is enabled with a simple checkbox on a test and older browser version are supported. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

Rainforest QA has recently improved its UI and that makes the tool more usable for a broader audience. As with any service, cost can be an issue. The ease with which Rainforest QA runs can be scheduled (and the almost game-like feedback one receives from each run!) quickly deplete the monthly test allowance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Rainforest QA will not magically maintain itself. When adopting it, make very clear who owns and maintains the tests. The more cross-training can occur (especially outside software QA teams) the more successful it will be in the long run. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

I brought in Rainforest QA to replace a manual release regression testing process. It allowed in-house testers (whose primary responsibility was unrelated to quality) to transition to more valuable exploratory testing in the production environment. Rainforest QA dramatically increased the predictability of test runs and allowed for unscheduled ad hoc testing during, e.g., system upgrades. The cross-browser testing added an additional benefit which was not originally anticipated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helpful?

EI

Executive Sponsor in Internet

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Review source: Organic

May 02, 2018

"Might be good in some cases but really didn't work for us"

What do you like best?

Honestly, we didn't get any value from it. We spent the entire time trying to get it up and running in a way that works with their system. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

We were sold something different than what we got. I wish we would have trialed the product. We ended up buying and getting no value from it but it was too late at that point. We also ran into many false positives where it said something was broken when it wasn't. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Push for a trial to ensure you will see ROI. They wouldn't work with us at all after we signed so it ended up being just a large sunken cost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

We were trying to improve our QA process. It ended up being more work to manage "Rainforest" than it was to solve the problem in a more traditional way. We didn't get any ROI on this investment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helpful?