Qase Reviews & Product Details

Easy-to-use interface, and it’s simple to upload cases or generate them using the Claude integration in QASE. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Less AIDEN credits and Just 90s data storage for the Start up plan Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I really like about Qase is how it keeps testing simple and stress-free. Everything from creating test cases to tracking progress feels smooth and organized. I also love that it connects easily with CI/CD and issues trackers, so nothing gets lost. It's a hug time-saver when reproducing bugs and makes it easy to keep the team on the same page. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I would love to see imoroved in Qase is more advanced reporting options, just to make insights even richer. The mobile experience could be a bit smoother, but it still gets the job done when checking tests on the go. Overall, these are minor tweaks, Qase already makes test management so much easier and more organised that small improvements would only make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase has a strong and well-thought-out core for test management. Test case structure is flexible and clear, making it easy to work with both manual and automated tests. Integrations with automation tools and CI pipelines are practical and save time in real QA workflows. Overall, the platform feels reliable for day-to-day test management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside is the current behavior of the AI assistant (Aiden). Deleting a step always removes the pause automatically, and the AI often regenerates previously deleted steps, ignoring manual changes. There is no way to lock steps, preserve deletions, or manage steps in bulk, which makes iterative refinement unpredictable and frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Qase is how easy it feels to work with. I can quickly review or update test cases without overthinking anything, and the test runs make it straightforward to see what’s working and what still needs attention, especially during a release. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven't really run into anything that stands out as a drawback. It's been pretty smooth to use in my day-to-day work, and it does what I expect without causing friction. Nothing that has slowed me down or made me look for alternatives. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What stands out most about Qase is how clean and well-structured it feels, even when handling large test suites. It organizing test cases, runs and milestones straightforward, without things getting overwhelming.

The UI is simple but still powerful - new team members can get comfortable with it quickly. Features like test case versioning, shared steps, and integrations (especially with tools like Jira and CI pipelines) genuinely helps save time in daily work.

Another thing worth mentioning is performance. Even with a high volume of test cases, it stays fast and responsive, which isn't something you see in every tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting could be more flexible and a bit easier to customize, especially when you need detailed insights. That said, for day-to-day use, it still does the job well and doesn't slow down the workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The helpdesk support & Automation plugins While it is much more expensive than Google Sheets, the value is amazing and well worth. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The documentation leaves much to be desired. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface is very intuitive and clean, which makes writing, organizing, and executing test cases fast and effortless. I also really appreciate how simple it is to manage test runs and keep track of the progress of my day-to-day testing tasks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the tool is great overall, the reporting and analytics features could be more robust. I would love to see more options for customizing dashboards and generating deeper, more specific reports for stakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Qase to be incredibly user-friendly, making it one of the easiest Test Management Systems I've used. It lets us track test runs and generate real-time reports with its clean interface. The test plan feature ensures nothing slips through the cracks. I also like that Qase feels like a modern app—it's fast and the UI is intuitive, so I don't need a manual to figure out how to write test cases. Its integration with Jira isn't just a link; it fully lives with our Jira setup. Qase helps reduce tool fatigue by eliminating double data entry, speeding up onboarding, and enhancing visibility. Setup was very easy for our team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find complexity in custom reporting and sorting a bit challenging, especially the need for multi-level sorting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Qase as a test management tool for our software projects and love how it keeps all our tests in one place in an orderly manner. It allows us to integrate manual tests with automated tests seamlessly, and the UI is nice, making it easy to keep track of things. The reporting system is very cool and precisely what we need. Custom fields and parameterization also help to keep things tidy and organized. The integration with Playwright is well done, and it was the main reason we chose Qase. I appreciate the ease of use, especially how simply adding Qase to the automated test results in having the test run generated and the result updated, which is really cool. Overall, the initial setup of Qase was pretty easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It would be cool if there was an option to exclude specific parameter combinations from sets of parameters. Another thing, it would be cool to restrict custom fields to a test suite, instead of just projects. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Qase is a good test case management system, making it easy for me to see my results pretty easily every day. It's intuitive to go through, which is a big plus. I also appreciate the run history within the test cases, which helps me immediately see how stable the test case is, whether it's flaky, and the environments it might be failing in. This feature allows me to do my analysis every morning faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some of the UI could be improved. For example, the percentages show the percentage of test cases run rather than pass percentage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.