Qase Reviews & Product Details

1. Visibility of both manual and automated tests

2. Easy access to historical data

3. Fast customer support.

4. Rare issues with performance or timing.

5. Out-of-the-box integrations with the most popular frameworks and ability to customize reporters.

6. Reasonable price! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Dashboards and queries - not possible to customize to our needs (e.g. filtering and sorting by custom field value is absent)

2. No shared Gherkin steps Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One word: organized.

The way QASE keeps everything structured for all the projects, test cases, test runs, and results making it a wonderful, easy-to-use tool. We started testing very early in a startup, when we didn’t yet have clearly defined requirements, and having that level of organization from QASE made it much easier to stay on track.

Also the customer support is top notch. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The integration worked well for linking defects and test cases, but I found synchronization limitations when updates were made after the initial creation. Ideally, I'd prefer tighter bidirectional synchronization to reduce duplicate work Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Qase is how straightforward it is. You don’t need a lot of time to get used to it-the UI is clean, and everything is where you expect it to be.

Creating and organizing test cases is easy, and it doesn’t feel heavy like some other test management tools. I use it daily to manage test cases, track runs, and it handles that without any confusion. The ability to link test cases with runs and see results clearly helps a lot during releases.

Integration is also a big plus. It works well with tools we already use, so it fits into the workflow instead of forcing us to change how we work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few small things. Sometimes the UI can feel a bit limited when you are working on large test suites-filtering and navigation could be a bit smoother.

Also, reporting could be improve. It works, but for more detailed insights or custom reports, you may still need to rely on external tools.

Nothing major, but these improvements would make it even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Qase is how simple it is to manage test cases and test runs in one place. It keeps everything well organized, so it's easy to track what is tested and what is pending.

I also like its clean interface, which makes it easy to use without much learning. It helps me save time and keeps my testing process clear and structured. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Qase is that a few features are not very clean at first, so it takes a bit of time to get comfortable with them.

But once I understand how things work, it becomes smooth and easy to use. Overall, it's a small learning curve and not a major issue. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase makes testing easy to understand and easy to track. Everything is in one place-test cases, test runs, results, and bug links. I can quickly open the dashboard and know what's going on without asking the QA team. It gives a clear view of what is tested, what failed, and what is still pending.

I also like how structured it is. Test cases are written in a clean way, so even if I didn't create them, I can still understand the flow. This helps when reviewing features or checking if edge cases are covered. It also helps during releases because I can quickly confirm if critical flows are tested or not.

Another useful thing is visibility. I don't need to wait for reports or meetings. I can directly check progress anytime. This saves time and helps me stay involved without interrupting the team. Overall, it makes testing more transparent and less dependent on manual updates or communication. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some parts still feel manual, especially when updating test cases after frequent product changes. If features are evolving fast, maintaining test cases takes extra effort. Also, organizing or searching for specific cases could be a bit smoother. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Qase is its simple and clean interface. It makes creating and managing test cases very easy, even when working on big projects. I can quickly organize test suites, reuse steps and keep everything in order without much effort. The integration with tool like Jira and CI/CD is also useful, as it helps keep testing connected with development work. Overall, it saves time and keeps things well organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few things that can be improved. Sometime it feels a bit slow when working with large test suites, and the reporting options could be better and more flexible.

Also, for new users, some features are not very easy to understand at first, so better guidance inside the tool would help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI is genuinely clean and doesn't take forever to onboard new team members, which was a big plus coming from older tools. Shared steps and test case suites save a lot of repetitive work, and creating test runs is quick once your cases are set up. The free tier is also surprising usable for smaller teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting feels basic once you actually need to dig into trends or generate something for stakeholders. The Jira integration works but isn't always reliable, and search starts to struggle when your test suite grows large. Bulk editing could also use some love. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Qase is how it balances simplicity with structure. It makes managing large sets of test cases feel organized without becoming overwhelming.

The test case management is especially strong-creating, grouping, and reusing test cases across different runs is smooth and saves a lot of onboard team members, since the UI is clean and doesn't require much learning curve.

Another highlight is its integration capability. Syncing with tools like Jira and CI pipelines helps keep development and QA aligned, which is critical in fast-moving environments.

Overall, it reduces manual effort while still giving enough control to manage complex QA workflows efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing major to dislike about Qase. Some feature like reporting could be more advanced, and performance can slightly slow with very large test suites- but overall, these are minor and don't affect daily workflow much. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the MCP. We have automated so much of our workflow thanks to it. The review workflow is also very useful for new people. Overall it is very easy to use and the cost is definitely worth it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Moving test cases isnt necessarily the easiest in the UI, very easy in the MCP however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase keeps test case management clean and structured without adding unnecessary complexity. The UI is easy to understand, so onboarding is quick even for new team members. I like how smoothly it handles test suites, runs and integrations (especially with CI/CD tools). It helps maintain clarity in large projects where test cases keep growing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some advanced features feel limited, especially when you try to customize workflows or reports in details. Also, performance can slow down slightly when working with very large test suites. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.